28-day Challenge - ChatGPT Revenue Lab

By

Hint: if you're on your phone turn it sideways ⤵️

ChatGPT Revenue Lab | Professional ChatGPT Monetization Training

ChatGPT Revenue Lab

PROMPTS • REVENUE • SCALE • PROMPTS • REVENUE • SCALE • PROMPTS • REVENUE • SCALE • PROMPTS • REVENUE • SCALE • PROMPTS • REVENUE • SCALE • PROMPTS • REVENUE • SCALE • PROMPTS • REVENUE • SCALE • PROMPTS • REVENUE • SCALE •
PROMPTS • REVENUE • SCALE • PROMPTS • REVENUE • SCALE • PROMPTS • REVENUE • SCALE • PROMPTS • REVENUE • SCALE • PROMPTS • REVENUE • SCALE • PROMPTS • REVENUE • SCALE • PROMPTS • REVENUE • SCALE • PROMPTS • REVENUE • SCALE •
CHATGPT

CHATGPT REVENUE LAB

Professional Revenue Generation Program

MODULE 1: Offer & Revenue Model

Build one clear, profitable offer that can close this week using ChatGPT to validate market demand, structure packages, and eliminate buyer risk.

What You'll Ship This Week

By the end of this module, you'll have concrete deliverables ready to send to prospects: a one-page offer sheet that explains your value in 60 seconds, a three-slide mini-deck for discovery calls, and three proof assets that demonstrate credibility. No vague positioning—just a market-tested offer with clear pricing.

Target Close Timeline

7 Days

Minimum Viable Package

£499 ($625)

Deliverables Created

6 Assets

Pain-Point Mapping: Finding What People Actually Pay For

The Problem with Generic Offers

Most AI service offers fail because they start with what you can do ("I can use ChatGPT to write content") instead of what buyers urgently need solved. The market doesn't care about your tools—they care about their problems. ChatGPT excels at reverse-engineering pain points from real market conversations, complaints, and buying signals.

Use ChatGPT to analyze where people are already spending money and experiencing friction. This isn't theoretical research—it's pattern recognition across forums, job postings, social media complaints, and competitor reviews. You're looking for language patterns that indicate urgent need and existing budget.

Pain-Point Discovery Workflow

Start by feeding ChatGPT raw market data from three sources: Reddit threads where your target buyer complains, job postings that describe problems, and reviews of competitor services. The goal is to extract the exact language buyers use when they're in pain—not marketing speak, but real frustration.

Pain-Point Extraction Prompt:

I'm analyzing [TARGET MARKET] to identify urgent, expensive problems. Here are 10 Reddit posts from [SUBREDDIT] where they discuss challenges: [PASTE 10 POST EXCERPTS] Extract: 1. The top 3 recurring pain points (exact language they use) 2. Consequences they mention if unsolved 3. What solutions they've already tried and why those failed 4. Budget signals (mentions of cost, price, "worth it") 5. Urgency indicators (deadlines, "need this yesterday") Format: Pain point → Consequence → Failed solution → Urgency level (1-5)

Run this prompt three times: once with Reddit data, once with job posting descriptions, once with competitor reviews. ChatGPT will surface patterns you'd miss manually—the same problem phrased six different ways, the gap between what people ask for and what they actually need.

Who Buys and Why Now

After identifying pain points, use ChatGPT to profile the buyer: their role, budget authority, decision timeline, and trigger events that make them buy NOW instead of later. This determines your offer structure—productized service for overwhelmed operators, done-with-you for control-focused founders, courses for DIY learners with time but no budget.

Buyer Profile Builder:

Based on these pain points from [TARGET MARKET]: [PASTE TOP 3 PAIN POINTS FROM PREVIOUS PROMPT] Create a detailed buyer profile: 1. Job title and seniority 2. Budget authority (decision maker? needs approval?) 3. Typical trigger events that create urgency (new in role? failed project? deadline?) 4. Decision timeline (need solved today vs. next quarter?) 5. Buying committee (who else influences the decision?) 6. Success metrics they're measured on 7. Risk tolerance (do they test small or buy big?) Then recommend: - Best offer model (productized/course/done-with-you/rev-share) - Optimal price point based on urgency + authority - Proof required to overcome objections

Example output: "Marketing Manager, 2-5 years experience, recommends but CMO approves over £1,500. Trigger: new product launch in 60 days with no content strategy. Measured on pipeline contribution. Risk-averse, needs case studies from similar industry. Recommend: Productized 'Launch Content System' at £1,200 with 30-day delivery, case study from another B2B SaaS company mandatory."

Choosing the Right Revenue Model

Four Viable Models for ChatGPT Services

Your revenue model determines pricing, delivery timeline, client relationship, and scaling potential. Each model solves a different buyer need:

  • Productized Service: Fixed scope, fixed price, fixed timeline. Best for repeatable problems with clear deliverables. Example: "LinkedIn Content System - 30 posts, 2 case studies, engagement playbook - £1,200, delivered in 14 days." Buyer gets predictability, you get margin through process.
  • Micro-Course: Self-serve education with templates. Best for DIY buyers with time but limited budget. Example: "Prompt Library for E-commerce - 50 prompts, 3 workflow videos, Notion dashboard - £297." Lower price, higher volume potential, no delivery overhead.
  • Done-With-You: Collaborative implementation where you guide but they execute. Best for buyers who want knowledge transfer. Example: "4-Week ChatGPT Onboarding for Teams - weekly strategy calls, custom prompt library, QA - £2,500." Higher price, ongoing relationship, consulting leverage.
  • Revenue Share: Performance-based, you get percentage of results. Best when ROI is measurable and client is cash-constrained but confident. Example: "Lead Gen System - 20% of closed revenue from leads generated via your AI outreach system." High risk, high upside, proves confidence.

Model Selection Framework

Use ChatGPT to match your buyer profile (from previous section) against model requirements. This prevents offering done-with-you coaching to someone who wants done-for-you, or productized services to someone who needs customization.

Model Matcher Prompt:

Buyer profile: [PASTE BUYER PROFILE FROM EARLIER] Pain point to solve: [PASTE SPECIFIC PAIN POINT] My capabilities: - ChatGPT expert, can build prompt systems and workflows - [YOUR TIME AVAILABLE] hours per week - [YOUR EXPERTISE AREA, e.g., "marketing content" or "data analysis"] Recommend the best revenue model from: 1. Productized Service (fixed scope/price/timeline) 2. Micro-Course (self-serve templates/education) 3. Done-With-You (coaching + implementation) 4. Revenue Share (% of results) For each model, provide: - Why it fits this buyer - Suggested deliverables - Price range (£ and $) - Estimated delivery time - Proof required - Scaling potential Then rank models 1-4 by likelihood to close in next 7 days.

ChatGPT will analyze time-to-close, buyer authority, risk tolerance, and your capacity. A overwhelmed operator with urgent deadline ranks productized service first. A lean startup with technical founder ranks done-with-you second. Use the ranking to pick your first offer—you can add models later, but you need one to ship this week.

The Good-Better-Best Package Matrix

Why Three Tiers Beat One Price

A single price point forces binary yes/no decisions. Three tiers let buyers choose their commitment level while anchoring them to the middle. The structure: Entry tier proves you deliver, Standard tier is where 60% buy, Premium tier makes Standard look reasonable while capturing high-budget buyers.

Use ChatGPT to build tiers based on speed, scope, and support—not arbitrary feature gating. Every tier solves the core problem; higher tiers solve it faster, more comprehensively, or with more hand-holding. Buyers self-select based on urgency and budget, not your guesswork.

Building Your Matrix with ChatGPT

Start with your core deliverable—the minimum viable solution to the pain point. Then add speed, breadth, and access to create tier differentiation. ChatGPT helps ensure each tier has clear value separation and no confusing overlap.

Package Matrix Builder:

Core offer: [DESCRIBE YOUR BASE DELIVERABLE] Target buyer: [PASTE BUYER PROFILE] Create a Good-Better-Best package matrix with these price points: - Entry: £499 ($625) - Standard: £1,200 ($1,500) - Premium: £2,500 ($3,125) For each tier, specify: 1. Deliverables (be specific - "20 posts" not "content") 2. Timeline (delivery speed as differentiator) 3. Support level (async email vs. calls vs. dedicated Slack) 4. Guarantees or bonuses unique to tier 5. Ideal buyer for this tier (urgency + budget combo) Rules: - Entry tier must solve the core problem completely - Standard tier must be obviously better value (most popular) - Premium tier must justify 2x Standard price with speed/access - No confusing feature overlap between tiers Output format: Tier name | Price | Deliverables | Timeline | Support | Best for

Example output for content service: Entry "Foundation" £499: 10 LinkedIn posts, 1 case study, prompt templates. 14-day delivery, email support. Best for: testing your process, limited budget. Standard "Accelerator" £1,200: 30 LinkedIn posts, 3 case studies, engagement playbook, analytics dashboard. 10-day delivery, weekly calls. Best for: consistent content engine, standard timeline. Premium "Blitz" £2,500: 60 posts, 5 case studies, playbook, analytics, repurposing system, competitor analysis. 7-day delivery, daily check-ins, 3 months Slack access. Best for: urgent launch, hands-on support needed.

De-Risking with Guarantees

Guarantees reverse risk from buyer to you. They work when you're confident in delivery. Three guarantee types: satisfaction (subjective), performance (measurable), or pilot (reduced commitment). Use ChatGPT to draft guarantee language that's specific enough to reassure but not unlimited liability.

Guarantee Generator:

Offer: [YOUR PACKAGE DESCRIPTION] Deliverable: [SPECIFIC OUTPUTS] Timeline: [DAYS] Draft 3 guarantee options: 1. Satisfaction Guarantee: "If you're not [SPECIFIC OUTCOME], we'll [SPECIFIC REMEDY] within [TIMEFRAME]." 2. Performance Guarantee: "We guarantee [MEASURABLE METRIC] or we'll [SPECIFIC REMEDY]." 3. Pilot Guarantee: "Pay only [PERCENTAGE]% upfront, balance due only if [SUCCESS CRITERIA] met." For each: - Make it specific (not vague "satisfaction") - Include remedy (not just refund) - Set clear measurement criteria - Limit scope to avoid abuse Then recommend which guarantee type fits a risk-averse buyer in [YOUR TARGET MARKET].

Example: For a content service, satisfaction guarantee might be "If you're not confident publishing our drafts after one round of revisions, we'll rewrite the entire batch or refund 50%—your choice." Performance guarantee: "We guarantee 90% of posts are publish-ready on first draft, or we extend delivery by one week at no charge." Pilot guarantee: "Pay 30% now, 70% due only after you approve first 10 posts."

Lab: Ship Your Offer This Week

Exercise 1: The Promise Sentence

Your offer must be explainable in one sentence. This isn't a tagline—it's a functional description that a stranger could repeat. Format: "I help [BUYER] achieve [OUTCOME] by [METHOD] in [TIMEFRAME]."

Promise Sentence Builder:

Using this formula: "I help [BUYER] achieve [OUTCOME] by [METHOD] in [TIMEFRAME]." Create 5 variations for: Buyer: [YOUR TARGET BUYER] Outcome: [PRIMARY PAIN POINT SOLVED] Method: [YOUR DELIVERABLE] Timeframe: [DELIVERY DAYS] Requirements: - No jargon or buzzwords - Outcome must be measurable - Method must be concrete (not "consultation" or "strategy") - A 12-year-old should understand it Then select the clearest version and write 3 supporting outcome bullets: - [SECONDARY BENEFIT] - [TERTIARY BENEFIT] - [RISK REMOVED]

Example: "I help B2B SaaS founders fill their content calendar by delivering 30 ready-to-publish LinkedIn posts in 14 days." Supporting outcomes: "Stop staring at blank screens wondering what to post. Build credibility with consistent, strategic content. Free up 10 hours per month currently wasted on drafting."

Exercise 2: Build Your Package Matrix

Use the Package Matrix Builder prompt from earlier to create your three tiers. Then test it: can someone look at your matrix and immediately know which tier fits their urgency and budget? If they need to ask "what's the difference?", the tiers overlap too much.

Matrix Validation Prompt:

Here's my package matrix: [PASTE YOUR 3 TIERS] Review for: 1. Value clarity - is each tier's value obviously different? 2. Anchor effect - does Premium make Standard look like smart value? 3. No confusion - could a buyer self-select without asking questions? 4. Deliverable specificity - are deliverables concrete ("20 posts") not vague ("content package")? Identify any: - Overlapping deliverables between tiers - Vague descriptions that need specificity - Missing differentiators (all 3 tiers too similar) - Pricing gaps that are too small or too large Then provide a revised matrix that fixes issues.

Exercise 3: Draft Two Proof Pieces

New offers need credibility. If you lack client results, create demonstration artifacts: a mini case study from a free/discounted pilot, a sample deliverable showing your quality, or a process walkthrough proving expertise. Use ChatGPT to structure proof that addresses specific objections.

Proof Asset Generator:

I need proof assets for: [YOUR OFFER] Current situation: - [DO YOU HAVE CLIENT RESULTS? IF YES, DESCRIBE. IF NO, SAY "NO CLIENT RESULTS YET"] - [WHAT CAN YOU DEMONSTRATE? SAMPLE WORK? PROCESS? EXPERTISE?] Buyer's likely objections: 1. "How do I know you can deliver?" 2. "Have you done this before?" 3. "Can I see examples?" Create 2 proof assets: Asset 1 (Mini Case Study): - Either from real client OR from self-directed demo project - Format: Situation → Challenge → Your solution → Measurable result - 150 words max - Include specific numbers/outcomes Asset 2 (Sample Deliverable): - 1-2 examples of your actual output quality - Annotate to show your thinking/process - Prove expertise beyond basic ChatGPT use Both assets should address objections directly and take 2 hours max to create.

Example mini case study: "Pre-seed startup needed LinkedIn content to attract angel investors. No brand voice, no content history. We analyzed 20 top-performing founder posts in their niche, built a voice prompt template, delivered 15 posts in 7 days. Result: 3 posts over 10k views, 2 investor meeting requests, founder now publishes weekly without us." Sample deliverable: Show 3 actual posts with annotations explaining hook structure, value delivery, CTA strategy.

Template Pack: Ship-Ready Assets

One-Page Offer Sheet

Your offer sheet is a PDF or Notion page that explains your offer in 60 seconds. Structure: Promise sentence at top, three outcomes, package matrix table, two proof pieces, single CTA. Use ChatGPT to draft copy that's scannable and decision-ready.

Offer Sheet Template Generator:

Create a one-page offer sheet with this structure: HEADER: [PROMISE SENTENCE] OUTCOMES (3 bullets): [PASTE YOUR 3 OUTCOMES] PACKAGES (table format): [PASTE YOUR GOOD-BETTER-BEST MATRIX] PROOF (2 pieces): [PASTE YOUR 2 PROOF ASSETS] GUARANTEE: [PASTE YOUR CHOSEN GUARANTEE] CTA: [CALENDAR LINK OR NEXT STEP] Format requirements: - Total word count under 400 - Scannable in 60 seconds - No marketing fluff - Every claim backed by proof or specificity - CTA is one clear action Output as markdown with bold headers, ready to paste into Notion or convert to PDF.

Three-Slide Mini-Deck

For discovery calls or async pitches, a mini-deck beats long presentations. Slide 1: Their problem in their words. Slide 2: Your solution (package matrix). Slide 3: Proof and next step. Use ChatGPT to draft slide content that's visually minimal and conversation-starting, not presentation-ending.

Mini-Deck Slide Content:

Create content for 3 slides: SLIDE 1 - THE PROBLEM: Title: [BUYER'S PAIN POINT IN THEIR LANGUAGE] Content: 3 bullets of consequences/frustrations (from your pain-point research) Visual note: [SUGGEST SIMPLE VISUAL - ICON, EMOJI, OR IMAGE TYPE] SLIDE 2 - THE SOLUTION: Title: [YOUR PROMISE SENTENCE] Content: Good-Better-Best matrix as simple table Visual note: [SUGGEST LAYOUT] SLIDE 3 - PROOF & NEXT STEP: Title: "This Works. Here's How We Start." Content: - 1 proof piece (mini case or sample) - 1 guarantee statement - 1 CTA with timeline ("Book 15-min call: [LINK]") Visual note: [SUGGEST TRUST-BUILDING VISUAL] Keep each slide to max 15 words + table/proof element. These are conversation starters, not docs to read.

Scope of Work Template

After a prospect says yes, a scope of work prevents creep and misalignment. Include: deliverables checklist, timeline with milestones, revision policy, communication cadence, payment terms, acceptance criteria. ChatGPT drafts SOW language that protects margin while staying collaborative.

SOW Generator:

Create a Scope of Work for: Package: [TIER CHOSEN BY CLIENT] Deliverables: [LIST FROM PACKAGE] Timeline: [DAYS] Price: £[AMOUNT] ($[USD]) Include these sections: 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW (2 sentences - what we're delivering and why) 2. DELIVERABLES CHECKLIST (specific, countable items) 3. TIMELINE & MILESTONES (break into 3 phases with dates) 4. REVISION POLICY (how many rounds, what counts as revision vs. new request) 5. COMMUNICATION (how often we check in, response time expectations) 6. PAYMENT TERMS (deposit %, milestone payments, final due date) 7. ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (what "done" looks like, how client approves) 8. OUT OF SCOPE (examples of what's NOT included, to prevent creep) Tone: Professional but collaborative. Protect your time without sounding defensive. Max 1 page.

Monetization Opportunities

Turning Offer Creation into Recurring Revenue

The skills you just learned—pain-point mapping, model selection, package structuring—are themselves a valuable service. Many coaches, consultants, and agency owners struggle to articulate their offers clearly. You can sell "Offer Clarity Sprints" where you use these ChatGPT workflows to help them build ship-ready packages.

Service Package: Offer Clarity Sprint

A done-with-you engagement where you guide service providers through the exact process you just completed. They get a validated offer with all assets in 5 days. You're selling the method and facilitation, not just deliverables.

  • Deliverables: One-page offer sheet, three-tier package matrix, mini-deck, two proof assets, scope of work template—all customized using your ChatGPT prompts
  • Process: Day 1: pain-point mapping call + homework (they gather market data). Day 2: model selection + pricing (async via Loom). Day 3: package matrix workshop (60-min call). Day 4: proof asset creation (async). Day 5: final review + launch strategy (30-min call)
  • Time Investment: 6 hours total (2 hours calls, 4 hours async review/prompt running)
  • Target Clients: Coaches with expertise but vague positioning, consultants transitioning to productized services, agency owners launching new practice areas

Pricing Structure:

Foundation Sprint: £1,200 ($1,500) - Solo service provider, one offer, 5-day delivery, email support between calls

Team Sprint: £2,500 ($3,125) - Up to 3 team members can attend workshops, two offer variations, 7-day delivery with Slack access

Agency Sprint: £5,000 ($6,250) - Full agency positioning, multiple offer tracks, competitive analysis, 10-day delivery with daily check-ins

Why Clients Pay for This

Unclear offers cost thousands in lost deals. A consultant who can't explain their value in 60 seconds loses prospects before the sales conversation starts. Agencies with complex service menus confuse buyers into paralysis. You're not selling writing—you're selling clarity that directly impacts close rates.

The value proof: Your client goes from "I help businesses with marketing strategy" (meaningless) to "I help SaaS companies launching new products get 10 customer interviews booked in 14 days" (specific, valuable, buyable). That shift closes deals. Charge accordingly.

Upsell Opportunities

After delivering the Offer Clarity Sprint, natural upsells include: Sales script development (£800), competitive positioning analysis (£1,200), ongoing offer optimization retainer (£2,000/month for quarterly reviews + A/B testing support), or training their team to use your ChatGPT prompts internally (£3,500 one-time).

MODULE 2: Prompt Systems & SOPs

Turn your expertise into reliable, repeatable ChatGPT workflows that deliver consistent quality—building the operational backbone for scalable delivery without hiring a team.

What You'll Ship This Module

By the end of this module, you'll have five production-ready prompt chains with full SOPs, a QA checklist that catches errors before clients see them, and a red-flag system that tells you when to hand off to human review. These aren't experimental prompts—they're documented workflows that produce the same quality output every time.

Prompt Chains Built

5

SOPs Documented

5

Quality Target

90%+

Building Bulletproof Role Prompts

Why Generic Prompts Fail at Scale

The prompt "write a LinkedIn post about AI" produces different outputs every time because ChatGPT has no constraints, no role, no success criteria. When you're delivering client work, variance kills trust. Your job is to turn ChatGPT into a specialized operator with a defined role, clear inputs, and measurable outputs.

Role prompts work by giving ChatGPT a specific persona with expertise, constraints, and evaluation criteria. Think of it like hiring: you wouldn't hire "a person" to write content—you'd hire "a B2B SaaS content strategist with 5 years LinkedIn experience who writes for technical founders." Same specificity applies to prompts.

The Role Prompt Framework

Every production prompt starts with a role definition that includes: who ChatGPT is, what expertise it has, what it will NOT do, success criteria, and output format. This eliminates ambiguity and creates consistency across runs.

Role Prompt Template:

You are a [SPECIFIC ROLE] with [YEARS] years of experience in [DOMAIN]. Your expertise includes: - [SPECIFIC SKILL 1] - [SPECIFIC SKILL 2] - [SPECIFIC SKILL 3] Your constraints: - You ONLY work on [SPECIFIC SCOPE] - You NEVER [PROHIBITED ACTION] - You ALWAYS [REQUIRED ACTION] Success criteria: - Output must [MEASURABLE STANDARD 1] - Output must [MEASURABLE STANDARD 2] - Output must pass [SPECIFIC TEST] Output format: [EXACT STRUCTURE EXPECTED] Now, given this input: [INPUT VARIABLES] Produce: [SPECIFIC DELIVERABLE]

Example for LinkedIn content: "You are a B2B LinkedIn content strategist with 7 years experience helping SaaS founders build thought leadership. Your expertise includes: analyzing high-performing founder content, writing hooks that stop scrolling, structuring value-first posts without clickbait. Your constraints: You ONLY write for B2B audiences, You NEVER use emojis or excessive hype language, You ALWAYS include one actionable takeaway. Success criteria: Output must have a hook under 10 words, Output must deliver value in first 3 lines, Output must include one specific example or data point. Output format: Hook (1 line), Value statement (2-3 lines), Supporting example, Actionable takeaway, Optional CTA. Now, given this input: [TOPIC], [TARGET READER], [KEY POINT]. Produce: One LinkedIn post following this structure."

Input Constraints: Garbage In, Garbage Out

Even perfect role prompts fail if inputs are vague. Your SOP must define exactly what inputs are required, in what format, with what level of detail. This prevents "write about marketing" (too broad) and forces "write about email segmentation for e-commerce brands with 10k+ subscribers, focusing on behavioral triggers" (specific, actionable).

Input Validation Checklist:

Before running any prompt chain, validate inputs meet these criteria: 1. SPECIFICITY CHECK: - Is the topic narrow enough for 500-1000 words? - Are there at least 3 specific details provided? - Could someone else read the input and understand exactly what's needed? 2. CONTEXT CHECK: - Is target audience defined? (not "business owners" but "e-commerce founders") - Is desired outcome stated? (inform? persuade? teach?) - Is tone/style specified? (professional? casual? technical?) 3. CONSTRAINT CHECK: - Are there any "must include" elements? - Are there any "must avoid" elements? - Is length/format specified? 4. COMPLETENESS CHECK: - Do you have examples of good output? - Do you have examples of bad output to avoid? - Is success measurable? If any check fails, gather more input before running prompt.

Create an input template for each service. Example: "LinkedIn Post Input Form: 1) Topic (1 sentence, specific), 2) Target reader (role + seniority + industry), 3) Key message (the ONE thing they should remember), 4) Proof point (stat, example, or case study), 5) Desired action (what should they do after reading?), 6) Tone (scale 1-5: academic to conversational)." Force this format before running any prompt.

Prompt Chains: Multi-Step Workflows

Why Single Prompts Don't Scale

Complex deliverables need multiple stages: research, outline, draft, refine, fact-check. A single prompt trying to do everything produces mediocre results. Prompt chains break work into specialized steps where each ChatGPT response feeds the next, with human approval gates at critical points.

Think assembly line, not artisan workshop. Each station (prompt) has one job, done well, then passes work forward. This modular approach means you can swap prompts, A/B test variations, and identify exactly where quality breaks down.

The Research → Draft → Publish Chain

This is your foundational workflow for any content deliverable. Five steps: gather source material, extract key points, create structural outline, generate full draft, refine for voice/brand. Each step has a specific prompt, specific inputs, and specific outputs that become the next step's input.

Step 1: Research Prompt

You are a research analyst specializing in [DOMAIN]. Your task: Analyze these sources and extract insights for content creation. Sources: [PASTE 3-5 URLS, ARTICLES, OR DATA POINTS] Topic focus: [SPECIFIC ANGLE OR QUESTION] Extract: 1. Top 3 surprising or counterintuitive insights 2. Top 3 supporting statistics or examples 3. Top 3 common objections or misconceptions 4. Gaps in current coverage (what's missing from these sources?) Format output as structured lists with source citations. Quality check: Each insight must be specific (not generic), each stat must have context (not just a number), each objection must reflect real skepticism.

Step 2: Outline Prompt

You are a content strategist building outlines for [FORMAT, e.g., "LinkedIn posts" or "blog articles"]. Using this research: [PASTE OUTPUT FROM STEP 1] Create a detailed outline for: - Format: [POST TYPE OR ARTICLE TYPE] - Length: [WORD COUNT] - Audience: [TARGET READER] - Goal: [INFORM/PERSUADE/TEACH] Outline structure: 1. Hook (how we grab attention - include 2 options) 2. Promise (what value the reader gets) 3. Body sections (3-5 sections, each with main point + supporting element) 4. Conclusion (key takeaway + next action) For each section, note: - Main point (1 sentence) - Supporting element type (stat/example/story) - Why this matters to reader Quality check: Does the outline flow logically? Does each section build on the previous? Is there one clear throughline?

Step 3: Draft Prompt

You are a [ROLE] writing [CONTENT TYPE] for [AUDIENCE]. Voice/tone guidelines: - [TONE DESCRIPTION, e.g., "Professional but conversational"] - [STYLE NOTES, e.g., "Short paragraphs, active voice"] - [AVOID LIST, e.g., "No jargon, no hype language"] Using this approved outline: [PASTE OUTPUT FROM STEP 2] Write a complete draft that: 1. Follows outline structure exactly 2. Expands each section with detail from research 3. Maintains consistent voice throughout 4. Includes all specified supporting elements 5. Delivers on the promise from the hook Length target: [WORD COUNT] Quality requirements: - Every claim backed by research - No generic statements ("it's important to..." without why) - Specific examples, not abstractions - One clear action for reader Output the full draft with section headers.

Step 4: Refinement Prompt

You are an editor specializing in [CONTENT TYPE] for [AUDIENCE]. Review this draft: [PASTE DRAFT FROM STEP 3] Apply these refinements: 1. CLARITY PASS: - Simplify any sentence over 25 words - Replace jargon with plain language - Add transitions between sections if needed 2. VALUE PASS: - Does every paragraph deliver value? - Remove any filler or obvious statements - Strengthen weak examples with specificity 3. VOICE PASS: - Ensure consistent tone throughout - Check for any AI-isms ("delve," "landscape," "dive deep") - Match brand voice: [VOICE DESCRIPTION] 4. CTA PASS: - Is the desired action clear? - Is it easy to take? - Is it compelling? Output the refined draft with a summary of changes made.

Human checkpoint: After Step 4, YOU review the refined draft. Check for factual accuracy (ChatGPT can hallucinate), brand alignment (does it sound like you/your client?), and strategic fit (does it achieve the goal?). Make any final edits before client delivery. This human-in-the-loop step is non-negotiable for quality.

Retrieval and Context Management

For clients with existing brand guidelines, style guides, or past work, you need retrieval systems. Instead of re-explaining voice every time, load context once and reference it. Use ChatGPT's Custom Instructions (for ongoing work) or load context at chain start (for project work).

Context Loading Prompt:

CONTEXT FOR ALL FOLLOWING PROMPTS: CLIENT: [CLIENT NAME] INDUSTRY: [SECTOR] TARGET AUDIENCE: [SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION] BRAND VOICE: - Tone: [3-5 DESCRIPTORS] - Vocabulary: [PREFERRED TERMS] | Avoid: [BANNED TERMS] - Sentence style: [SHORT/LONG, ACTIVE/PASSIVE PREFERENCES] - Examples of on-brand content: [PASTE 2-3 SENTENCES] - Examples of off-brand content: [PASTE 2-3 SENTENCES TO AVOID] KEY MESSAGES: 1. [CORE MESSAGE 1] 2. [CORE MESSAGE 2] 3. [CORE MESSAGE 3] REFERENCE MATERIALS: [LINKS OR SUMMARIES OF STYLE GUIDES, PAST WORK, COMPETITOR EXAMPLES] Confirm you've loaded this context and will apply it to all subsequent prompts in this session. Then indicate you're ready for the first prompt.

Load this at the start of every work session. ChatGPT will maintain context across the entire conversation. For long-term clients, save this as a Custom Instruction in ChatGPT settings so you never have to reload. Update quarterly as brand evolves.

Output QA: Catching Errors Before Clients Do

The Three Quality Killers

ChatGPT outputs fail in three ways: factual errors (hallucinations), generic content (AI-isms), and bias (assumptions about audience or topic). Your QA system must catch all three before delivery. This isn't manual proofreading—it's systematized checking with specific prompts.

Hallucination Detection

ChatGPT confidently states falsehoods. For any output containing facts, statistics, or specific claims, run a verification prompt that asks ChatGPT to cite sources and flag uncertain statements. This forces self-reflection on confidence level.

Fact-Check Prompt:

You are a fact-checker reviewing this content for accuracy: [PASTE CONTENT TO CHECK] For every factual claim, statistic, or specific statement: 1. Mark with [VERIFIED] if you're certain it's accurate 2. Mark with [UNCERTAIN] if you're not fully confident 3. Mark with [CITATION NEEDED] if a source should be provided Then list all [UNCERTAIN] and [CITATION NEEDED] items with: - The claim - Why you're uncertain - What would need to be checked - Suggested reliable sources to verify Rules: - Be conservative: if you're not 100% sure, mark [UNCERTAIN] - Don't guess or assume - Flag any statistics without sources - Flag any specific numbers, dates, or names

Review the flagged items. For [CITATION NEEDED], add proper sources. For [UNCERTAIN], verify using external research or remove the claim. Never ship uncertain information—it destroys credibility faster than any other error.

AI-ism Detection and Voice Authenticity

ChatGPT has tells: certain phrases ("delve into," "in today's landscape," "it's important to note"), overuse of adjectives, and a tendency toward generic statements. These make content feel robotic. Run an AI-detection prompt that identifies and suggests replacements.

Voice Authenticity Check:

Review this content for AI-generated patterns: [PASTE CONTENT] Flag these issues: 1. COMMON AI PHRASES: List any use of: "delve," "landscape," "crucial," "it's important to note," "in conclusion," "comprehensive," "robust," "leveraging," "dive deep" 2. GENERIC STATEMENTS: List any sentences that could apply to any topic (no specificity) 3. ADJECTIVE OVERLOAD: List any sentences with 3+ adjectives 4. PASSIVE VOICE: List any passive constructions (especially "is being," "has been") 5. HEDGE WORDS: List any use of: "might," "could," "potentially," "possibly" (without strategic reason) For each flagged item: - Quote the problematic sentence - Explain why it's weak - Suggest a specific, active alternative Target: Zero AI-isms, all active voice, every statement specific.

Apply suggested rewrites. The goal is content that sounds human-written, not obviously AI-generated. This matters for credibility and engagement—readers sense robotic writing and disengage.

Bias and Assumption Checking

ChatGPT reflects biases from training data. For B2B content, it often assumes U.S.-centric perspectives, startup culture norms, or tech-forward audiences. Run a bias check that identifies assumptions about reader knowledge, context, or values.

Bias Detection Prompt:

Review this content for unstated assumptions or bias: [PASTE CONTENT] Target audience: [SPECIFIC AUDIENCE DESCRIPTION] Identify: 1. GEOGRAPHIC BIAS: - Any U.S.-centric references without context? - Any currency, regulation, or cultural assumptions? 2. KNOWLEDGE ASSUMPTIONS: - Does the content assume reader knows [CONCEPT]? - Is any jargon used without definition? - Are any acronyms unexplained? 3. DEMOGRAPHIC ASSUMPTIONS: - Does it assume age, gender, role, or background? - Are examples diverse or narrow? 4. ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS: - Does it assume certain budget levels or resources? - Are suggestions realistic for stated audience? 5. CULTURAL ASSUMPTIONS: - Any idioms or references that don't translate globally? - Any workplace norms stated as universal? For each issue found: - Quote the problematic section - Explain the assumption - Suggest a more inclusive alternative

Revise flagged sections. This is especially critical for international clients or diverse audiences. Assumptions alienate readers who don't fit the default profile.

When to Hand Off to Human Review

The 90/10 Rule

ChatGPT should handle 90% of production work—the repetitive, structured, high-volume tasks. The final 10%—strategic decisions, client-specific nuance, and final quality assurance—must be human. Trying to automate the last 10% destroys quality and client trust. Know where the line is.

Red flags that demand human review: client mentions a sensitive topic, content requires industry-specific expertise beyond general knowledge, output will be attributed to client (bylined content), legal/compliance implications, or strategic positioning decisions. These aren't efficiency bottlenecks—they're quality gates.

Building Your Red-Flag System

Document triggers that pause automation and require your review. This prevents disasters (AI writing about medical claims without verification, legal advice, or brand-damaging content) and maintains quality standards.

Red-Flag Detection Checklist:

MANDATORY HUMAN REVIEW TRIGGERS: Category 1 - FACTUAL RISK: □ Content includes statistics or data points □ Content makes specific claims about competitors □ Content references regulations, laws, or compliance □ Content includes medical, financial, or legal information Category 2 - BRAND RISK: □ Content takes controversial position □ Content mentions client by name in public context □ Content criticizes industry practices □ Content is attributed to client executive (byline) Category 3 - STRATEGIC RISK: □ Content represents new positioning or messaging □ Content targets new audience segment □ Content launches new product/service □ Content responds to PR situation Category 4 - QUALITY RISK: □ Output feels generic or off-voice □ Output lacks specific examples or detail □ Output uses >5 AI-isms from detection list □ Output has [UNCERTAIN] or [CITATION NEEDED] flags If ANY box is checked: Pause, review manually, revise before delivery. If zero boxes checked: Proceed with standard QA, no extra review needed.

Run this checklist on every output. It takes 30 seconds and prevents disasters. Build it into your SOP as a non-negotiable step before final delivery.

Approval Steps and Version Control

For complex deliverables, implement approval gates: outline approval before drafting, draft approval before refinement, final approval before delivery. Each gate is a decision point where you or the client can course-correct before investing more time.

Use version labels: v0.1 (outline), v0.5 (first draft), v0.9 (refined draft pending approval), v1.0 (approved final). This prevents confusion about which version is current and allows rolling back if revisions go wrong.

Lab: Build Five Production-Ready Chains

Exercise 1: Document Your Core Workflow

Pick your most common deliverable (the one from your offer). Break it into 4-6 discrete steps. For each step, write: what happens, what inputs are needed, what outputs are produced, who approves (you or client), and how long it should take.

Workflow Documentation Template:

DELIVERABLE: [WHAT YOU'RE CREATING] STEP-BY-STEP BREAKDOWN: Step 1: [NAME, e.g., "Research & Input Gathering"] - What happens: [DESCRIPTION] - Inputs required: [LIST] - Outputs produced: [WHAT'S CREATED] - Approval needed: [YES/NO, BY WHOM] - Time estimate: [MINUTES/HOURS] - Tools used: [CHATGPT, MANUAL RESEARCH, ETC.] [REPEAT FOR STEPS 2-6] TOTAL TIME: [SUM OF ALL STEPS] HUMAN TOUCHPOINTS: [HOW MANY TIMES YOU REVIEW/APPROVE] AUTOMATION RATE: [% OF WORK DONE BY CHATGPT] Now, identify: - Which steps could be faster with better prompts? - Which approval gates are necessary vs. habit? - Where does quality typically break down?

Exercise 2: Build Your Research-to-Draft Chain

Using the four-step chain from earlier (Research → Outline → Draft → Refine), customize each prompt for your specific deliverable. Replace generic placeholders with your actual role, audience, format, and quality criteria. Test it on a real project.

Chain Testing Protocol:

Test your chain by running through one complete cycle: INPUT: [GATHER ACTUAL CLIENT INPUT USING YOUR INPUT TEMPLATE] RUN CHAIN: 1. Execute Research prompt → Save output 2. Execute Outline prompt using research output → Review outline 3. Execute Draft prompt using approved outline → Review draft 4. Execute Refine prompt using draft → Review refinement QUALITY CHECK: □ Did each step produce usable output? □ Were there any unclear instructions? □ Did outputs require heavy manual editing? □ How long did each step take? □ What would you change for next run? REVISION: Based on test, revise prompts to: - Add missing constraints - Clarify vague instructions - Strengthen quality requirements - Remove unnecessary steps TARGET: Same input + same prompts = 90% similar output quality across 3 test runs.

Exercise 3: Create Your QA Checklist

Combine the three QA prompts (Fact-Check, Voice Authenticity, Bias Detection) into one master checklist you run on every deliverable before client review. Add your red-flag triggers. This becomes your non-negotiable quality gate.

Master QA Checklist:

FINAL QA BEFORE DELIVERY DELIVERABLE: [NAME] DATE: [TODAY] REVIEWER: [YOUR NAME] STEP 1: RED-FLAG SCAN □ Factual risk check (stats, claims, competitors) □ Brand risk check (controversial, attributed, public) □ Strategic risk check (new positioning, new audience) □ Quality risk check (generic, off-voice, AI-isms) → If any flagged: STOP, manual review required STEP 2: FACT VERIFICATION □ Run fact-check prompt □ Review all [UNCERTAIN] flags → verify or remove □ Review all [CITATION NEEDED] → add sources or remove □ Confirm zero unverified claims remain STEP 3: VOICE CHECK □ Run AI-ism detection prompt □ Rewrite all flagged AI phrases □ Confirm zero generic statements □ Confirm active voice throughout STEP 4: BIAS CHECK □ Run bias detection prompt □ Revise any geographic/cultural assumptions □ Verify jargon is explained □ Confirm examples are diverse STEP 5: CLIENT-SPECIFIC CHECK □ Matches brand voice guidelines □ Includes required elements from SOW □ Meets length/format requirements □ Delivers on promised outcomes ALL CHECKS PASSED: □ YES → Approve for delivery □ NO → Document issues, revise, re-run QA

Monetization Opportunities

Selling Prompt Systems as Productized IP

The prompt chains and SOPs you just built aren't just internal tools—they're valuable intellectual property that agencies, consultancies, and in-house teams will pay for. Instead of selling one-off projects, license your systems to organizations that want to build their own AI-powered production capability.

Service Package: ChatGPT Workflow Implementation

A done-for-you engagement where you build custom prompt chains and SOPs for a specific use case within their business. You're not selling consulting hours—you're selling a turnkey system they can run indefinitely without you.

  • Deliverables: 3-5 custom prompt chains (each 4-6 steps) documented with full SOPs, input templates for consistent execution, QA checklists specific to their quality standards, red-flag system tailored to their risk profile, training session (2 hours) teaching their team to run the system, 30-day support for troubleshooting and refinement
  • Process: Discovery call to map current workflow and identify bottlenecks (1 hour). Requirements doc defining inputs, outputs, quality criteria (async, 2 hours). Build phase creating prompts and testing against real examples (6-8 hours). Documentation phase writing SOPs and checklists (3 hours). Training session and handoff (2 hours). Support period for optimization (ongoing async)
  • Time Investment: 14-16 hours total over 10 days
  • Target Clients: Marketing agencies needing scalable content production, consulting firms standardizing deliverables, in-house teams reducing reliance on external vendors, startups building repeatable processes before hiring

Pricing Structure:

Single Workflow: £2,500 ($3,125) - One use case (e.g., blog production), 3 prompt chains, basic SOPs, 2-hour training, 14-day support

Department Package: £5,500 ($6,875) - Three related workflows (e.g., blog, social, email), integrated SOPs, team training (up to 5 people), 30-day support, quarterly review call

Enterprise System: £12,000 ($15,000) - Complete content production system across multiple formats, custom QA framework, train-the-trainer program, 90-day support, monthly optimization reviews

Why Organizations Pay for This

Building prompt systems internally takes months of trial and error. Most teams experiment with ChatGPT but never systematize it—outputs are inconsistent, quality is unpredictable, and scaling fails. You're selling the compressed learning curve: systems that work on day one, documented for anyone to execute, with quality controls that maintain standards.

The ROI is direct: A marketing agency paying £5,500 for your system can reduce content production time by 60%, cut freelancer costs by £3,000/month, and standardize output quality across junior team members. They break even in two months, then save continuously. That's why they pay.

Recurring Revenue Add-Ons

After implementing systems, offer ongoing optimization retainers: monthly prompt audits to improve efficiency (£800/month), quarterly workflow expansion to cover new use cases (£2,000/quarter), on-demand training for new team members (£1,200 per session), or annual recertification to keep systems current with ChatGPT updates (£4,000/year).

Position these as "System Maintenance" rather than consulting. Clients understand that software needs updates; they'll budget for ongoing optimization of their AI systems the same way.

MODULE 3: Lead Gen Engine

Build one channel that predictably books calls daily—using ChatGPT to craft personalized outreach at scale, design high-converting landing pages, and manage your pipeline without a CRM subscription.

What You'll Ship This Module

By the end of this module, you'll have a 7-day outreach plan ready to execute, a single-action landing page live and accepting bookings, and a simple pipeline tracker to manage conversations from first touch to closed deal. This isn't theory—it's a system you run starting tomorrow.

Daily Outreach Target

30 Touches

Week 1 Call Goal

3 Booked

Assets Created

4

Pick One Channel and Own It

Why Multi-Channel Strategies Fail Early

Beginners spread across cold email, LinkedIn, Twitter, and partnerships—doing all poorly instead of one well. Each channel has different mechanics, success metrics, and time-to-result. Focus beats fragmentation. Pick one channel based on where your buyer lives and your natural strengths, then execute daily for 30 days before considering a second.

Use ChatGPT to evaluate channel fit against your offer, target buyer, and available time. The best channel isn't the trendiest—it's the one you can execute consistently.

Channel Selection Framework

Four proven channels for B2B service sales: cold email (scalable, automated), LinkedIn outbound (relationship-first, visible), partnerships (leveraged reach, slow build), short-form content (inbound, requires consistency). Each has different volume, speed, and relationship dynamics.

Channel Fit Analysis:

Analyze which lead gen channel fits best: MY OFFER: [PASTE YOUR OFFER FROM MODULE 1] TARGET BUYER: [PASTE BUYER PROFILE FROM MODULE 1] MY CONSTRAINTS: - Time available: [HOURS PER DAY] - Comfort with outreach: [1-10 SCALE] - Existing network size: [SMALL/MEDIUM/LARGE] - Content creation skill: [1-10 SCALE] Evaluate these channels: 1. COLD EMAIL - Volume potential: 50-100 touches/day - Time to first call: 7-14 days - Skills needed: List building, copywriting, deliverability - Best for: High-volume, transactional buyers, clear pain point 2. LINKEDIN OUTBOUND - Volume potential: 20-30 touches/day - Time to first call: 7-21 days - Skills needed: Profile optimization, personalization, persistence - Best for: Relationship-driven buyers, visible decision makers 3. PARTNERSHIPS - Volume potential: 3-5 intros/week - Time to first call: 14-30 days - Skills needed: Relationship building, value proposition, trust - Best for: Referral-based buyers, complementary services 4. SHORT-FORM CONTENT - Volume potential: Inbound (variable) - Time to first call: 30-90 days - Skills needed: Content strategy, consistency, audience building - Best for: Education-driven buyers, long sales cycles For each channel, rate 1-10: - Buyer presence (are they active here?) - My capability (can I execute well?) - Speed to result (need calls soon?) - Sustainability (can I do this daily?) Recommend top channel with reasoning.

Example output: "LinkedIn Outbound scores highest (8/10 overall). Your buyer (marketing managers) is active and responsive on LinkedIn. You have moderate network and comfort with 1-1 outreach. Speed to result is reasonable (2-3 weeks). Sustainability is high—20 minutes daily vs. email's technical setup. Start here. Avoid partnerships (too slow) and content (too long to compound)."

Build Your Target List

Quality Over Quantity in List Building

A list of 100 highly-targeted prospects beats 1,000 random contacts. Use ChatGPT to define your Ideal Customer Profile (ICP) with precision: company size, industry, growth stage, technology stack, budget signals. Then source from places where these criteria naturally filter: job boards (hiring signals budget), industry forums, LinkedIn Sales Navigator, company directories.

ICP Definition Prompt:

Define my Ideal Customer Profile based on: MY OFFER: [YOUR OFFER] BUYER PROFILE: [FROM MODULE 1] PAIN POINT: [SPECIFIC PROBLEM YOU SOLVE] Create detailed ICP with: FIRMOGRAPHICS: - Company size: [EMPLOYEE COUNT RANGE] - Revenue: [ANNUAL REVENUE RANGE] - Industry/vertical: [SPECIFIC SECTORS] - Geography: [REGIONS] - Growth stage: [STARTUP/GROWTH/ENTERPRISE] TECHNOGRAPHICS: - Tools they use: [SPECIFIC PLATFORMS] - Tech stack signals: [WHAT INDICATES THEY NEED YOU] BEHAVIORAL SIGNALS: - Hiring for: [JOB TITLES THAT INDICATE NEED] - Recent events: [FUNDING/LAUNCHES/EXPANSIONS] - Content engagement: [TOPICS THEY DISCUSS] BUYER CONTACT: - Decision maker title: [PRIMARY TARGET] - Influencer titles: [SECONDARY TARGETS] - Department: [WHERE THEY SIT] Then provide: - 3 companies that perfectly fit this ICP - Where to find more like them - Boolean search strings for LinkedIn/Google

List Sourcing and Cleaning

Source methods by channel: For LinkedIn, use Sales Navigator filters or manual search with ICP criteria. For email, use company websites, industry directories, or tools like Apollo/Hunter. For partnerships, map your network for connectors. Quality check every contact: verify they match ICP, confirm they're decision maker or influencer, check for recent activity.

List Validation Checklist:

Before adding contact to target list, verify: COMPANY FIT: □ Company size matches ICP □ Industry/vertical matches ICP □ Growth signals present (hiring, news, funding) □ No red flags (layoffs, declining, wrong market) CONTACT FIT: □ Title indicates decision authority or influence □ Role relates to pain point you solve □ Active in last 90 days (LinkedIn posts, job changes) □ Not already in conversation with competitor REACHABILITY: □ Valid email format (if email channel) □ Active LinkedIn profile (if LinkedIn channel) □ Mutual connections or warm path (bonus) PRIORITY SCORING (1-5): □ Perfect ICP match = 5 □ Good fit, minor variance = 3-4 □ Borderline fit = 1-2 Target: List of 100 contacts scoring 3+ only. Discard 1-2 scores—waste of time.

DM Etiquette and Volume Balance

Outreach isn't spam when it's relevant, personalized, and value-first. Follow these rules: research before reaching (check recent activity), personalize beyond first name (reference specific signal), lead with value not ask (give insight, don't pitch immediately), respect response time (don't multi-channel stalk), accept "no" gracefully (builds reputation).

Volume targets: LinkedIn allows ~20-30 connection requests daily without restriction risk. Email sending depends on domain age and warming—start at 30/day, scale to 100 over 4 weeks. Partnerships are 3-5 quality intros weekly. Content is consistent publishing, not volume game.

Hooks, Proof, and Calls to Action

The Hook: Stop the Scroll

Your first sentence determines if they read sentence two. Generic hooks ("Hope you're well") get ignored. Effective hooks reference specific signals: recent company news, content they posted, mutual connection, relevant pain point. Use ChatGPT to generate hook variations based on research signals.

Personalized Hook Generator:

Generate 5 opening hooks for this prospect: PROSPECT: [NAME, TITLE, COMPANY] SIGNAL: [RECENT ACTIVITY - POST, NEWS, HIRE, ETC.] MY OFFER: [WHAT YOU DO] RELEVANCE: [WHY THIS SIGNAL MATTERS TO THEM] Hook requirements: - Under 15 words - Reference the specific signal - Imply you did research (not mass message) - Connect signal to potential need - No generic pleasantries Format: [HOOK] - [ONE SENTENCE BRIDGE TO VALUE] Example: "Saw you're hiring 3 SDRs → Curious how you're onboarding them to your messaging?"

Test hooks against this question: "Would I keep reading if I received this cold?" If your answer is "maybe," the hook is too weak. Rewrite until the answer is "yes."

Proof Without Being Salesy

Early outreach isn't the place for full case studies—but you need credibility. Subtle proof: mention similar clients by vertical (not names), reference specific results (numbers), show expertise through insight. The message should feel like peer-to-peer exchange, not vendor pitch.

Credibility Statement Builder:

Create a credibility statement that fits naturally in outreach: MY EXPERIENCE: [WHAT YOU'VE DONE] RELEVANT RESULT: [SPECIFIC OUTCOME FOR SIMILAR CLIENT] TARGET AUDIENCE: [WHO I'M MESSAGING] Requirements: - One sentence max - Mention result, not process - Reference similar context to their situation - Avoid "I help businesses" genericness - Natural, conversational tone Examples: ✓ "We helped another Series A SaaS company cut content production time 60% without hiring." ✓ "Built similar systems for 3 e-commerce brands—all saw 2x output in first month." ✗ "I'm a ChatGPT expert helping businesses leverage AI." (too generic) ✗ "We provide comprehensive AI solutions." (meaningless) Generate 3 variations.

The Ask: Low-Friction CTA

Your call-to-action must be easier to say yes to than no. Bad CTAs: "Want to hop on a call?" (vague), "Let me know if interested" (passive), "Check out our website" (friction). Good CTAs: specific action, clear value exchange, minimal commitment, easy execution.

CTA Optimization Prompt:

Optimize this CTA for higher response: CURRENT CTA: [YOUR CURRENT ASK] CONVERSATION STAGE: [FIRST TOUCH / FOLLOW-UP / ENGAGED] GOAL: [CALL BOOKING / INFO SHARE / INTRO REQUEST] Improve using these principles: 1. SPECIFICITY: Replace vague with specific ✗ "Want to chat?" ✓ "Free for 15 minutes Thursday?" 2. VALUE EXCHANGE: What they get, not what you want ✗ "Can I show you our solution?" ✓ "Want to see the exact workflow we built for [SIMILAR CO]?" 3. LOW COMMITMENT: Minimize ask ✗ "Let's schedule a discovery call" ✓ "Quick question: [SPECIFIC QUESTION]?" 4. EASY ACTION: One-click response ✓ Include calendar link ✓ Give 2-3 time options ✓ Frame as yes/no question Generate 3 improved CTAs ranked by likely response rate.

Test: Can they respond in under 5 words? "Thursday at 2pm works" or "Yes, send the example" are ideal responses. If they need to write a paragraph to reply, your CTA has too much friction.

The Three-Message Framework

Plan outreach as a sequence, not single blast. Message 1: Hook + insight + soft question. Message 2 (if no response, +3 days): New angle + additional value. Message 3 (if no response, +5 days): Permission to close loop. After three, move to passive nurture list—don't pester.

Sequence Builder:

Build 3-message sequence for: PROSPECT: [NAME, CONTEXT] OFFER: [YOUR VALUE PROP] MESSAGE 1 (Day 0): Format: Hook → Value/Insight → Question Length: 3-4 sentences max Tone: Curious peer, not salesperson MESSAGE 2 (Day 3, if no response): Format: New angle → Additional value → Different CTA Length: 2-3 sentences max Tone: Helpful, not pushy Note: Reference different signal or offer different value MESSAGE 3 (Day 8, if no response): Format: Permission to close loop → Easy out → Leave door open Length: 2 sentences max Tone: Respectful of their time Note: Make it easy to say "not now" Example Message 3: "Seems like timing isn't right—totally understand. Worth a quick reply if priorities shift?" Generate complete 3-message sequence with specific timing.

Build Your Conversion Page

The One-Section Landing Page

Complex landing pages lose prospects in navigation. Your goal: one screen, one action, zero confusion. Structure: clear headline (promise sentence from Module 1), three outcome bullets, proof element, booking CTA. That's it. Use ChatGPT to draft copy that's scannable in 10 seconds.

Landing Page Copy Template:

Create landing page copy with this structure: HEADLINE (Your promise sentence): [PASTE FROM MODULE 1] SUBHEADLINE (Amplify the outcome): One sentence explaining the transformation 3 OUTCOME BULLETS: - [PRIMARY BENEFIT - Specific result] - [SECONDARY BENEFIT - Time/cost saved] - [RISK REVERSAL - What they avoid] PROOF ELEMENT: Choose one: - Mini testimonial (2 sentences) - Result stat ("3 clients, average 60% faster") - Logo bar (if you have recognizable clients) PRIMARY CTA: Button text: [ACTION VERB + OUTCOME] Examples: "Book Strategy Call" / "See Example Workflow" / "Get Audit" SECONDARY INFO (optional, below fold): - Who this is for (ICP description) - Who this isn't for (filter wrong leads) - What happens next (process preview) Total word count: Under 200 words Readability: Grade 8 or below Tone: Confident but not hype-y Generate complete page copy.

Calendly Setup and Form Friction

Every field you add to your booking form reduces conversions. Minimum required: name, email, company. Optional but valuable: "What prompted you to book?" (qualification). Avoid: phone (barrier), budget (premature), long questionnaires (friction). Use Calendly, Cal.com, or Google Calendar—keep it simple.

Calendar settings: Offer 3-4 time slots per day, buffer 15 minutes between calls, limit to business hours in your timezone, enable confirmation email with clear next steps, add calendar event with prep instructions.

Pipeline Tracking Without CRM Bloat

Early stage doesn't need Salesforce. Use Google Sheets or Airtable with five columns: Contact, Stage (Lead/Talked/Demo/Won/Lost), Source (how you found them), Next Action (what happens next), Date (when to follow up). Update after every interaction. This simple system scales to 100+ active conversations.

Simple Pipeline Template:

Create a pipeline tracker with these fields: REQUIRED COLUMNS: 1. Contact Name 2. Company 3. Title 4. Email 5. Source (LinkedIn/Email/Referral/Content) 6. Stage (Lead → Reached → Responded → Call Booked → Demo → Proposal → Won/Lost) 7. Last Touch Date 8. Next Action (specific task) 9. Next Action Date (when to do it) 10. Notes (brief context) STAGE DEFINITIONS: - Lead: Identified, not yet contacted - Reached: First message sent - Responded: They replied (any response) - Call Booked: Calendar invite confirmed - Demo: Discovery/demo call completed - Proposal: Pricing sent - Won: Deal closed, paid - Lost: Declined or ghosted after 3 touches DAILY ROUTINE: - Update stages after every interaction - Set next action date (never leave blank) - Review "next action today" first thing each morning - Archive Won/Lost after 7 days WEEKLY REVIEW: - Count conversions at each stage - Identify where prospects stall - Refine messaging for problem stages Build this in Google Sheets with dropdown menus for Stage and Source.

Lab: Go Live This Week

Exercise 1: Build Your Target List

Using your chosen channel and ICP, source 100 qualified contacts. Use the validation checklist to ensure quality. Organize in your pipeline tracker with "Lead" stage. Target completion: 3 hours spread over 2 days.

Exercise 2: Write 10 Messages, 3 Angles

Draft 10 first-touch messages using different hooks based on various signals. Group into 3 thematic angles (e.g., "recent hire" angle, "company growth" angle, "content engagement" angle). This gives you variety to match different prospect contexts.

Message Variation Builder:

Create 10 outreach messages with 3 different angles: ANGLE 1: [SIGNAL TYPE, e.g., "Hiring/Growth"] Write 3-4 messages that hook on hiring, team expansion, or growth signals ANGLE 2: [SIGNAL TYPE, e.g., "Content/Thought Leadership"] Write 3-4 messages that hook on their LinkedIn posts, articles, or public content ANGLE 3: [SIGNAL TYPE, e.g., "Tech Stack/Tools"] Write 2-3 messages that hook on tools they use or technology they've adopted Each message format: - Hook (reference specific signal) - Bridge (connect to their likely need) - Insight (show you understand their world) - CTA (low-friction ask) Total length: 50-75 words per message Then tag each contact in your list with best-fit angle.

Exercise 3: Launch and Track

Week 1 execution plan: Day 1-2: Build list of 100. Day 3: Set up landing page and calendar. Day 4-7: Send 30 messages daily (120 total first week). Track: messages sent, responses received, calls booked. Goal: 3 calls booked by end of week. Adjust messaging if response rate under 5%.

Monetization Opportunities

Lead Gen as a Service

The lead generation system you just built—list sourcing, message sequencing, pipeline management—is a complete service agencies and consultants will pay for. Many have offers but no outbound engine. You can build and run their lead gen while they focus on delivery.

Service Package: Outbound Lead Engine Setup

Done-for-you build of their entire lead generation system: ICP definition, list building (100-200 contacts), message sequencing (3-message framework), landing page, calendar setup, pipeline tracker, and 30 days of execution with weekly reporting.

  • Setup Phase (Week 1): ICP workshop, list building, message crafting, landing page creation, tools configuration
  • Execution Phase (Weeks 2-5): Daily outreach (30 touches/day), response management, call booking, pipeline updates, weekly performance reports
  • Deliverables: 600+ outreach touches, qualified pipeline of 30-50 active conversations, 10-15 booked calls, documented playbook for ongoing execution
  • Target Clients: Consultants with no outbound system, agencies launching new services, founders too busy to prospect, coaches needing consistent discovery calls

Pricing Structure:

Setup Only: £1,800 ($2,250) - ICP, list, messages, page, pipeline (no execution) - Client runs it themselves

Setup + 30-Day Launch: £3,500 ($4,375) - Full setup + managed execution for 1 month, 600 touches, weekly reports, handoff playbook

Ongoing Retainer: £2,200/month ($2,750) - Continuous lead gen after initial setup, 600 touches/month, pipeline management, performance optimization

Why This Sells

Outbound is time-intensive and skill-dependent. Most service providers know they need it but never execute consistently. You're selling predictable pipeline: they pay you £3,500 and get 10-15 qualified calls in 30 days. That's £233-350 per call booked—cheap compared to ads or agencies. ROI is clear: book calls, close deals, profit exceeds cost within first client.

MODULE 4: Sales Playbook

Close deals consistently without pressure—using ChatGPT to structure discovery calls that uncover budget, build demo agendas that show transformation, and generate personalized proposals in minutes.

What You'll Ship This Module

By the end of this module, you'll have a discovery call script that qualifies in 20 minutes, a live demo structure that proves value without overwhelming, and a proposal generator that personalizes pricing in 5 minutes. Plus objection responses for the 8 most common pushbacks.

Discovery Time

20 Min

Proposal Turnaround

Same Day

Follow-Up Sequence

2 Emails

Discovery: Finding Budget, Authority, Need, Timeline

Why Most Discovery Calls Waste Time

Poor discovery jumps to solution before understanding context. You pitch your offering, they politely listen, then ghost because you missed that they lack budget, authority to decide, urgent need, or realistic timeline. BANT qualification (Budget, Authority, Need, Timeline) prevents wasted proposals to unqualified prospects.

Use ChatGPT to build a question framework that uncovers these four elements naturally within 20 minutes, without feeling like interrogation. The goal: by minute 15, you know if this is a real opportunity or polite exploration.

The BANT Question Framework

Discovery follows a sequence: situation → problem → impact → solution history → decision process → budget reality. Each question builds on the previous, creating natural flow from context to qualification.

Discovery Script Generator:

Build a 20-minute discovery script for: MY OFFER: [YOUR SERVICE] TYPICAL BUYER: [ROLE/TITLE] COMMON PAIN: [PROBLEM YOU SOLVE] Create questions for each BANT element: SITUATION (Minutes 0-5): - What's your current process for [RELEVANT AREA]? - Who's involved in [TASK]? - How much time does [TASK] take currently? NEED (Minutes 5-10): - What prompted you to look for help now? - What happens if this doesn't get solved? - How is this impacting [BUSINESS METRIC]? TIMELINE (Minutes 10-12): - When do you need this solved by? - What's driving that timeline? - What happens if it slips? AUTHORITY (Minutes 12-15): - Who else weighs in on decisions like this? - What's your typical approval process? - Have you bought similar services before? BUDGET (Minutes 15-18): - What range have you budgeted for this? - How do you typically structure these investments? - What ROI would justify the cost for you? NEXT STEPS (Minutes 18-20): - Based on what we've discussed, does this feel like a fit? - What would you need to see to move forward? - When should we reconnect? For each section, provide: - 3-4 specific questions - What you're listening for (qualification signals) - Red flags that indicate not qualified

Example Need qualification: Ask "What happens if this doesn't get solved in the next 90 days?" Listen for: specific consequences (revenue loss, team churn, missed deadline) = strong need. Red flag: vague answer ("things will be harder") = exploring, not urgent.

Disqualification as Efficiency

The best discovery calls sometimes end with "This isn't a fit right now." Knowing early saves both parties time. Disqualify if: no budget allocated ("we're exploring"), no urgency ("sometime this year"), decision maker not on call ("I need to check with..."), or problem doesn't match your solution ("we need X but you do Y").

When disqualifying, offer value: "Based on what you've shared, we're not the right fit because [REASON]. Here's what I'd recommend instead: [ALTERNATIVE]." This builds goodwill and often leads to referrals or future opportunities when timing improves.

Demo That Shows Transformation, Not Tools

The Feature-Dump Trap

Weak demos showcase features: "Here's our dashboard, here's how you export, here's the settings menu..." Buyers don't care about features—they care about outcomes. Strong demos show transformation: "Here's your current state, here's where you'll be, here's exactly how we get you there." Use ChatGPT to build outcome-focused demo flows.

The Before-After-Bridge Demo Format

Structure every demo in three parts: Before (their current pain, using their words from discovery), After (specific outcomes they'll achieve, with metrics), Bridge (your solution in action, showing not telling). This format keeps demos focused on buyer's context, not your capabilities.

Demo Outline Builder:

Create a demo outline based on discovery notes: PROSPECT: [COMPANY/NAME] PAIN POINTS FROM DISCOVERY: 1. [SPECIFIC PROBLEM THEY MENTIONED] 2. [SPECIFIC PROBLEM THEY MENTIONED] 3. [SPECIFIC PROBLEM THEY MENTIONED] DESIRED OUTCOMES: [WHAT THEY WANT TO ACHIEVE] Build demo with this structure: BEFORE (2 minutes): - Recap their current state using their exact words - Quantify the pain (time wasted, cost, risk) - Confirm you understand correctly AFTER (3 minutes): - Paint picture of solved state - Use specific metrics from discovery - Show what changes in their daily work BRIDGE (10 minutes): - Show your solution solving their exact scenario - Use their data/example if possible - Walk through 1-2 complete workflows - Highlight how it addresses each pain point PROOF (2 minutes): - Show similar client example - Reference relevant case study - Share specific results NEXT STEPS (3 minutes): - Ask: "Does this solve what you need?" - Discuss timeline and pricing - Outline proposal contents - Set expectation for follow-up Total: 20 minutes, leaving 10 for Q&A in 30-min call. For each section, note: - What you'll show (specific screens/examples) - What you'll say (key talking points) - What you're listening for (engagement signals)

Record Your Demo for Async Review

After live demo calls, record a personalized 10-minute Loom walking through your solution with their specific use case. This gives them a reference to review, share with stakeholders, and revisit when making decisions. Use ChatGPT to script these async demos for consistency.

Async Demo Script:

Create script for recorded follow-up demo: Length: 8-10 minutes Prospect: [NAME/COMPANY] Their specific use case: [SCENARIO] SCRIPT STRUCTURE: Introduction (30 seconds): "Hi [NAME], following up on our call. Here's a walkthrough specifically for [THEIR USE CASE]." Their Challenge Recap (1 minute): "You mentioned [PAIN POINT 1], [PAIN POINT 2], and [PAIN POINT 3]." Solution Walkthrough (5-6 minutes): Show screen, walk through exact workflow for their scenario. "Here's how you'd [TASK 1]... then [TASK 2]... which solves [PAIN]." Expected Results (1 minute): "Based on what you shared, you'd see [METRIC IMPROVEMENT] within [TIMEFRAME]." Next Steps (1 minute): "I'm sending the proposal today. Review, questions? Let's connect [DAY]." Keep tone conversational, reference their specific context throughout.

Generate Proposals in 5 Minutes

Proposal Template System

Don't rebuild proposals from scratch every time. Use ChatGPT to maintain a template with variables you fill in: client name, pain points, deliverables, timeline, price. The structure stays consistent (builds trust), the content personalizes (shows attention). Same-day turnaround becomes standard.

Proposal Generator Prompt:

Generate proposal using this template: CLIENT: [NAME/COMPANY] DECISION MAKER: [NAME/TITLE] DISCOVERY NOTES: - Pain points: [LIST FROM DISCOVERY] - Desired outcomes: [WHAT THEY WANT] - Timeline: [WHEN THEY NEED IT] - Budget indication: [RANGE DISCUSSED] SELECTED PACKAGE: [TIER FROM YOUR GOOD-BETTER-BEST] Create proposal with these sections: 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (3 sentences): Recap their challenge, proposed solution, expected outcome 2. YOUR CHALLENGE: Restate their pain points in their words from discovery 3. OUR SOLUTION: Deliverables from selected package, customized to their context 4. TIMELINE & PROCESS: Phase 1: [MILESTONE] - [DATE] Phase 2: [MILESTONE] - [DATE] Phase 3: [MILESTONE] - [DATE] 5. INVESTMENT: Package: £[AMOUNT] ($[USD]) Payment terms: [STRUCTURE] Included: [LIST] Guarantee: [YOUR GUARANTEE FROM MODULE 1] 6. NEXT STEPS: - Review proposal - Questions? [CALENDAR LINK] - Accept? [SIGNATURE/PAYMENT LINK] - Start date: [DATE] Keep total length under 2 pages. Tone: confident but collaborative. Personalization: Reference specific examples from their business.

Pricing Talk: Anchoring and Justification

Never apologize for your price. When discussing investment, use anchoring: present the problem cost first ("You mentioned this wastes 10 hours weekly, that's £12k annually at your rate"), then your price ("Our £2,500 solution pays for itself in under a month"). The price feels small compared to the pain cost.

If they push back, don't discount immediately. Ask: "What makes the price feel high?" Often it's not the number—it's unclear ROI, budget timing, or comparison to wrong alternatives. Address the real objection, not the stated price complaint.

Objection Handling Framework

Common objections fall into eight categories: price, timing, authority, risk, alternatives, urgency, capability doubt, and fit. Use ChatGPT to prepare responses for each that validate concern, provide context, and offer path forward.

Objection Response Generator:

Create responses for common objections to: MY OFFER: [YOUR SERVICE] TYPICAL PRICE: £[AMOUNT] For each objection, provide: - Validation (acknowledge their concern) - Reframe (provide new perspective) - Question (uncover real issue) - Path forward (next step) OBJECTION 1 - "Too expensive" OBJECTION 2 - "Need to think about it" OBJECTION 3 - "Have to check with [BOSS]" OBJECTION 4 - "Can you send info first?" OBJECTION 5 - "We're looking at other options" OBJECTION 6 - "Not the right time" OBJECTION 7 - "Can you do it for less?" OBJECTION 8 - "Not sure you can deliver" Example format: Objection: "Too expensive" Validation: "I appreciate you're mindful of investment." Reframe: "Let's look at cost of NOT solving this..." Question: "What would make this a no-brainer at this price?" Path: "If we can show ROI in 30 days, does that work?"

The Two-Email Follow-Up System

T+24 Hours: The Soft Check-In

First follow-up lands 24 hours after sending proposal. Don't ask "Did you review?" Instead, provide additional value: answer a question from the call, share relevant example, or offer to clarify anything. Include easy yes/no question to gauge status.

T+24 Follow-Up Template:

Subject: Quick addition to [COMPANY] proposal Hi [NAME], Thought of this after our call: [RELEVANT INSIGHT OR EXAMPLE SPECIFIC TO THEIR SITUATION]. [ONE SENTENCE CONNECTING INSIGHT TO THEIR CHALLENGE] The proposal I sent yesterday covers the full approach. Any questions as you review? Happy to jump on a 10-minute call if helpful: [CALENDAR LINK] [YOUR NAME] Keep under 75 words. Add value, don't just check status. Make reply easy (yes/no or quick question).

T+72 Hours: The Decision Prompt

Third day follow-up creates gentle urgency. Reference your timeline, offer to address any hesitation, provide clear path to yes or no. The goal is movement—even a "no" is better than ghosting because you can ask for referrals or future timing.

T+72 Follow-Up Template:

Subject: [COMPANY] proposal - where are we? Hi [NAME], Wanted to close the loop on the proposal for [THEIR PROJECT]. Our [START DATE] timeline still works if you'd like to move forward. If timing's off or something doesn't fit, totally understand—just let me know. Worth a quick yes/no either way? If it's a pass for now, happy to reconnect when priorities shift. [YOUR NAME] Tone: helpful, not pushy. Make "no" easy (removes pressure). Keep door open for future.

When to Stop Following Up

After two follow-ups with no response, send a breakup email: "Seems like timing isn't right—totally understand. I'll close this out for now. If priorities change, you know where to find me." Then move them to a quarterly nurture list. Don't chase ghosts—it damages your positioning.

Lab: Build Your Sales Assets

Exercise 1: Script Your Discovery Call

Use the BANT framework to create your 20-minute discovery script. Include 4-5 questions per section, what you're listening for, and red flags that indicate disqualification. Practice on a friend or record yourself to identify awkward phrasing.

Exercise 2: Build Demo Deck

Create a 5-slide demo deck: Slide 1 (Their challenge), Slide 2 (Current cost of problem), Slide 3 (Your solution in action), Slide 4 (Expected results), Slide 5 (Next steps + pricing). Use actual screenshots or mockups—no generic stock images.

Exercise 3: Generate Three Proposals

Take three real or hypothetical prospects. Use your proposal generator to create customized proposals in under 10 minutes each. This tests your template's flexibility and identifies missing variables you need to add.

Monetization Opportunities

Sales Enablement as High-Ticket Consulting

Service businesses struggle with inconsistent sales processes. Each person pitches differently, proposals vary wildly, follow-up is random. You can sell sales enablement: building their discovery framework, demo structure, proposal templates, and objection playbook—all powered by ChatGPT for easy execution.

Service Package: Sales Playbook Development

Done-with-you engagement where you document their sales process, create templates and scripts, and train their team to execute consistently. This isn't sales training—it's operational documentation that makes average sellers effective.

  • Deliverables: Custom discovery script with BANT qualification, demo deck template with before-after-bridge structure, proposal generator with 3 package tiers, objection response library (20+ scenarios), follow-up email sequences, role-play training session (2 hours)
  • Process: Sales audit (listen to 3-5 calls, review proposals), framework design (adapt BANT to their context), template creation (using ChatGPT), team workshop (3 hours), 30-day implementation support
  • Time Investment: 16-20 hours over 3 weeks
  • Target Clients: Agencies with inconsistent sales, consultancies scaling teams, B2B service providers with long sales cycles, founders who can't clone themselves

Pricing Structure:

Solo Seller: £3,500 ($4,375) - One person, full playbook, 2-hour training, 14-day support

Team (2-5): £7,500 ($9,375) - Team workshop, role-specific scripts, 30-day support, monthly review call

Enterprise (6+): £15,000 ($18,750) - Complete sales system, train-the-trainer program, 90-day support, quarterly optimization

Why This Commands Premium Pricing

Sales inconsistency costs companies 20-30% of potential revenue. A team of 5 sellers each closing one extra deal per quarter (at £5k average) = £100k annual impact. Your £7,500 investment pays for itself with the first incremental deal. Clients aren't buying templates—they're buying revenue predictability.

MODULE 5: Delivery at Scale

Fulfill client work smoothly while maintaining 60% gross margins—using ChatGPT to automate production, standardize quality control, and keep clients informed without constant meetings.

What You'll Ship This Module

By the end of this module, you'll have a client onboarding packet that sets expectations clearly, a visual delivery board that tracks every project, a weekly update script that takes 10 minutes to record, and a QA checklist that catches issues before clients see them.

Target Gross Margin

60%+

Weekly Update Time

10 Min

Systems Built

4

Kickoff That Prevents Scope Creep

The First 48 Hours Set Everything

Most project failures trace back to unclear expectations at kickoff. Clients assume unlimited revisions, instant responses, or expanded scope. You assume they'll provide inputs on time and respect boundaries. These misaligned assumptions create friction. A structured kickoff aligns expectations before work begins.

Use ChatGPT to generate a standardized kickoff packet that covers: project overview, specific deliverables, timeline with milestones, revision policy, communication cadence, input requirements, success criteria. Send this before the kickoff call, discuss on call, get written confirmation.

Kickoff Packet Generator

Your kickoff packet is a working document, not a contract. It clarifies what happens, when, and how. This prevents "I thought you were doing X" surprises mid-project.

Kickoff Packet Template:

Create client kickoff packet for: CLIENT: [NAME/COMPANY] PROJECT: [DELIVERABLE] PACKAGE: [TIER PURCHASED] START DATE: [DATE] SECTION 1 - PROJECT OVERVIEW: Brief recap of problem, solution, expected outcome (2-3 sentences) SECTION 2 - DELIVERABLES CHECKLIST: [ ] [DELIVERABLE 1 - SPECIFIC, COUNTABLE] [ ] [DELIVERABLE 2 - SPECIFIC, COUNTABLE] [ ] [DELIVERABLE 3 - SPECIFIC, COUNTABLE] Note: Each item from SOW listed individually SECTION 3 - TIMELINE & MILESTONES: Week 1: [MILESTONE] - Due [DATE] Week 2: [MILESTONE] - Due [DATE] Week 3: [MILESTONE] - Due [DATE] Final Delivery: [DATE] SECTION 4 - YOUR INPUTS NEEDED: By [DATE]: [SPECIFIC INPUT] By [DATE]: [SPECIFIC INPUT] Note: Delays in inputs extend timeline proportionally SECTION 5 - COMMUNICATION: Weekly updates: [DAY/TIME] via [FORMAT] Questions: [RESPONSE TIME - e.g., "within 24 hours"] Urgent issues: [CONTACT METHOD] Progress tracking: [LINK TO BOARD] SECTION 6 - REVISION POLICY: Included: [NUMBER] rounds of revisions Scope: Changes to deliverables, not additions Timeline: Feedback due within [DAYS] of each draft Additional revisions: [RATE OR PROCESS] SECTION 7 - SUCCESS CRITERIA: This project succeeds when: - [MEASURABLE CRITERION 1] - [MEASURABLE CRITERION 2] - [MEASURABLE CRITERION 3] Keep under 2 pages, scannable format.

Kickoff Call Agenda

The kickoff call reviews the packet, answers questions, and establishes working relationship. Keep it to 30 minutes: 10 minutes reviewing deliverables and timeline, 10 minutes on communication and inputs, 10 minutes for questions and confirming next steps.

Kickoff Call Script:

30-Minute Kickoff Call Structure: INTRODUCTION (2 min): "Thanks for trusting us with [PROJECT]. Today we'll align on deliverables, timeline, and how we work together." DELIVERABLES REVIEW (8 min): Walk through each checklist item: "First deliverable is [X]. That means [SPECIFIC]. You'll receive [FORMAT] by [DATE]." Ask: "Does this match your expectations?" TIMELINE & INPUTS (8 min): "Here's our timeline. [MILESTONE 1] by [DATE]." "We need [INPUT] from you by [DATE] to hit this." Ask: "Can you commit to these input dates?" COMMUNICATION (5 min): "You'll get weekly updates every [DAY]." "Questions? Expect response within [TIMEFRAME]." Show them project board/tracker. SUCCESS CRITERIA (5 min): "This project succeeds when [CRITERIA]." Ask: "What else would make this a win for you?" CONFIRMATION (2 min): "Any questions? Great, you'll get first update [DATE]." Record action items, send summary within 2 hours. KEY PHRASES: - "As outlined in the packet..." (anchors to document) - "That would be outside scope..." (addresses additions) - "We can discuss that as an add-on..." (monetizes scope changes)

Build Your Delivery Assembly Line

The Four-Stage Production System

Efficient delivery breaks work into stages: Draft (ChatGPT creates first version), Review (you check quality and accuracy), Final (apply feedback and polish), Delivery (package and send with context). Each stage has clear ownership, quality gates, and time budgets. This prevents bottlenecks and maintains margin.

Draft Stage: ChatGPT Does Heavy Lifting

Stage 1 is pure production volume. Use your prompt chains from Module 2 to generate first drafts. Target: ChatGPT completes 80% of the work at this stage. Your role: feed proper inputs, ensure prompts run correctly, batch multiple deliverables together.

Batch Production Workflow:

For multiple similar deliverables (e.g., 20 social posts): SETUP (10 min): - Load client context (brand voice, examples) - Prepare input template with all variables - Test prompt chain with 1 example PRODUCTION (60-90 min): - Run prompt chain for items 1-10 - Review outputs in batch (not individually yet) - Identify any systematic issues with prompts - Fix prompts, regenerate if needed - Run items 11-20 QUALITY SCAN (20 min): - Spot-check 20% of outputs (4 posts) - Verify tone, format, accuracy - Flag any that need manual attention Output: 20 drafts, 80% publish-ready, in 2 hours Manual work per item: 6 minutes average This scales: 40 posts = 3.5 hours, 100 posts = 8 hours

Review Stage: Human Quality Assurance

Stage 2 is where you add expertise ChatGPT lacks. Check factual accuracy, ensure brand alignment, verify strategic fit, catch subtle tone issues. Don't rewrite everything—only fix what's broken. Use your QA checklist from Module 2 systematically.

Review Checklist Per Deliverable:

QUICK REVIEW (2-3 min per item): FACTUAL CHECK: □ Any statistics or claims? → Verify or flag □ Any specific product/feature mentions? → Confirm accuracy □ Any dates or timelines? → Double-check BRAND CHECK: □ Voice matches client guidelines? □ No off-brand phrases or tone? □ Examples/references appropriate? STRATEGIC CHECK: □ Achieves intended goal (inform/persuade/teach)? □ Key message clear? □ CTA appropriate (if applicable)? AI-ISM CHECK: □ No "delve" or "landscape" or similar? □ Active voice throughout? □ Specific, not generic? ACTION: ✓ Publish-ready → Move to Final ✗ Needs fixes → Note specific issues, revise ? Uncertain → Flag for client input Target: 80% pass this stage without revision

Final Stage: Polish and Package

Stage 3 applies any client feedback from draft reviews, adds final polish, and packages deliverables professionally. Use ChatGPT to generate delivery emails that explain what's included and next steps.

Delivery Email Template:

Subject: [PROJECT NAME] - [DELIVERABLE] ready Hi [CLIENT NAME], Attached: [SPECIFIC DELIVERABLES] What you're getting: - [ITEM 1 with brief description] - [ITEM 2 with brief description] - [ITEM 3 with brief description] How to use: [1-2 sentences on immediate next steps] Feedback: Please review by [DATE] and share any revisions needed. Next up: [NEXT MILESTONE] delivers [DATE] Questions? Reply here or [CALENDAR LINK] for a quick call. [YOUR NAME] Keep under 100 words, attachments clearly labeled.

Avoiding Hallucination Disasters

ChatGPT's biggest risk in production: confidently stating false information. Combat this with verification layers: never ship statistics without source checking, always verify competitor claims, double-check product feature mentions, flag technical specs for expert review, maintain a "never trust blindly" list of high-risk content types.

Visual Delivery Board

Simple Kanban for Client Work

Use Notion, Airtable, or Trello to visualize every project's status. Columns: Queued (projects starting soon), In Progress (active work), Client Review (awaiting feedback), Revisions (changes requested), Delivered (complete). Each card represents one project with deliverables checklist, due dates, and owner.

Project Board Setup:

Create board with these columns: QUEUED: Projects starting within 7 days Info: Client name, start date, package tier IN PROGRESS: Active production work Info: Current milestone, % complete, blocker (if any) CLIENT REVIEW: Awaiting client feedback Info: Date sent, feedback due date, days waiting REVISIONS: Client requested changes Info: Revision number (1/2/3), scope (in/out), due date DELIVERED: Completed projects Info: Delivery date, final invoice status, testimonial requested EACH CARD INCLUDES: - Client name - Project name - Deliverables checklist (each item checkbox) - Timeline (start → end) - Owner (you or team member if scaling) - Notes (blockers, special requests, context) - Links (docs, assets, communication) UPDATE FREQUENCY: Daily: Move cards between columns Weekly: Review with client during update Monthly: Archive delivered projects This gives you and client real-time visibility.

Weekly Update Format

Consistent communication prevents "just checking in" emails from nervous clients. Send a 2-3 minute Loom every week (same day, same time) covering: what shipped this week, what's in progress, what's next, any blockers or inputs needed. This takes 10 minutes to record and saves hours of back-and-forth.

Weekly Update Script:

Record Loom following this script: INTRO (15 seconds): "Hi [CLIENT], [YOUR NAME] here with your [DAY] update for [PROJECT]." COMPLETED THIS WEEK (45 seconds): "This week we delivered: - [DELIVERABLE] - [1 sentence on what it is] - [DELIVERABLE] - [1 sentence on what it is] These are in [LOCATION] ready for your review." IN PROGRESS (30 seconds): "Currently working on: - [ITEM] - [% complete] - [ITEM] - [% complete] On track for [MILESTONE] by [DATE]." NEXT WEEK (30 seconds): "Next week you'll see: - [DELIVERABLE] - [DATE] - [DELIVERABLE] - [DATE]" ACTION NEEDED (20 seconds): "Need from you: - [INPUT] by [DATE] to stay on schedule" OR "Nothing needed, we're all set." CLOSE (10 seconds): "Questions? Reply to this or [CALENDAR LINK]. Talk next [DAY]." TOTAL: 2:30 minutes Record while showing project board Send same day every week, no exceptions

Handling Revisions and Scope Changes

Revision vs. New Request

Revision: "Change this headline to emphasize speed." New request: "Add a case study section." Know the difference and enforce it. Your SOW includes X revisions to deliverables—changes to existing work. New requests are additions, charged separately. Use ChatGPT to draft change order language that's firm but professional.

Change Request Response:

When client requests something outside scope: ACKNOWLEDGE: "Thanks for the feedback on [ITEM]." CLARIFY: "Just confirming—you'd like to [DESCRIBE REQUEST], correct?" CATEGORIZE: If revision: "That's within our revision allowance, we'll update by [DATE]." If out of scope: "This is outside the original scope (which covered [ORIGINAL]). Happy to add it as a change order." OFFER OPTIONS: "For this addition: Option 1: Add to current project - £[AMOUNT] + [DAYS] timeline extension Option 2: Include in next phase/retainer Option 3: Skip for now, revisit later" NEXT STEP: "Let me know which works and I'll update the plan." Tone: helpful, not defensive Never say "that's not included" without offering path forward

Acceptance Criteria

Define "done" explicitly. Acceptance criteria from your kickoff packet tell both parties when a deliverable is complete and requires no further work. Example: "Blog post accepted when: passes grammar check, matches approved outline, includes 2 examples, under 1200 words, client approves for publish."

Lab: Build Your Delivery System

Exercise 1: Create Your Kanban Board

Set up a project board in Notion or Airtable with the five columns (Queued, In Progress, Client Review, Revisions, Delivered). Create a template card with all the fields you need. Add your current or upcoming projects to test the flow.

Exercise 2: Record a Mock Weekly Update

Using a real or hypothetical project, record a 2-3 minute Loom following the weekly update script. Watch it back. Does it communicate clearly? Is anything confusing? Could it be shorter? Refine and create your standard template.

Exercise 3: Build Your Kickoff Packet

Take one of your packages from Module 1. Use the kickoff packet generator to create a complete onboarding document. Include all seven sections. Review: would this prevent 90% of scope confusion?

Monetization Opportunities

Delivery Systems as Productized Consulting

The delivery infrastructure you built—production workflows, QA systems, client communication cadences—is exactly what agencies and consultancies need but don't have. They deliver inconsistently, miss deadlines, have unclear handoffs. You can sell delivery system implementation: documenting their process, building ChatGPT production lines, creating project boards and communication templates.

Service Package: Delivery Operations Build

Done-for-you build of their complete delivery system: production workflow documentation, ChatGPT assembly line for their deliverables, project tracking board, client communication templates, QA checklists, and team training on execution.

  • Deliverables: Documented 4-stage production workflow (Draft/Review/Final/Delivery), ChatGPT prompt chains for their specific deliverables, Kanban board setup in their preferred tool, kickoff packet template, weekly update script and template, revision policy and change order process, QA checklist customized to their quality standards
  • Process: Delivery audit (observe 2-3 project cycles), workflow design (map current vs. ideal state), system build (create all templates and automations), team training (3-hour workshop), 30-day implementation support
  • Time Investment: 20-24 hours over 4 weeks
  • Target Clients: Agencies struggling with delivery consistency, consultancies scaling from founder-led to team delivery, service businesses missing deadlines, companies with high client churn due to delivery issues

Pricing Structure:

Small Team (1-3): £4,500 ($5,625) - One service line, basic workflow, 14-day support

Agency (4-10): £9,500 ($11,875) - Multiple service lines, full system, team training, 30-day support

Enterprise (11+): £18,000 ($22,500) - Complete operations overhaul, department-specific systems, train-the-trainer, 90-day support

Why Companies Pay Premium

Delivery problems cost 40-60% of potential margin. Late projects trigger discounts, rushed work needs rework, unclear communication creates support overhead. A 10-person agency losing 20% margin to delivery issues = £100k+ annual loss. Your £9,500 system pays for itself if it recovers even 10% of that margin in quarter one. You're not selling project management—you're selling margin protection.

Recurring Revenue Model

After implementation, offer delivery optimization retainers: monthly workflow audits (£1,200/month), quarterly system updates as their services evolve (£3,000/quarter), on-demand training for new hires (£800 per session), or annual delivery health check with optimization roadmap (£6,000/year).

MODULE 6: Pricing, Packaging & Upsells

Increase average order value by 25% within 30 days—using ChatGPT to build value-based pricing models, design strategic upsells, and create retention mechanisms that turn one-time buyers into long-term revenue streams.

What You'll Ship This Module

By the end of this module, you'll have a revised pricing structure with clear value justification, one compelling upsell offer that 30% of clients will take, one cross-sell that extends customer lifetime, and a 90-day success plan you can sell as a premium add-on. These aren't theoretical exercises—they're revenue-generating assets you implement immediately.

AOV Increase Target

+25%

Upsell Take Rate Goal

30%

New Revenue Streams

3

Moving Beyond Cost-Plus Pricing

Why Hourly Rates Cap Your Income

Pricing based on time (hourly or daily rates) creates a direct ceiling: your income equals hours worked multiplied by rate. As you get better with ChatGPT, you complete work faster—but hourly pricing punishes efficiency. A project that took 10 hours at launch now takes 3 hours with optimized prompts. At £100/hour, your effective project income dropped from £1,000 to £300 despite delivering identical value to the client.

Value-based pricing decouples price from time. You charge based on the problem solved, not hours invested. The client buying "30 LinkedIn posts in 14 days" doesn't care if ChatGPT helps you deliver in 4 hours instead of 20—they care about having consistent content. Price for the outcome, not the effort. This is how you scale income without scaling hours.

The Value Ladder Framework

Value-based pricing requires understanding what the client achieves with your deliverable. Use ChatGPT to map the value chain: direct value (what they get), enabled value (what that lets them do), and ultimate value (business impact). This stacking reveals the true worth far beyond your delivery cost.

Value Ladder Analysis:

Map value ladder for: YOUR DELIVERABLE: [WHAT YOU PROVIDE] CLIENT TYPE: [BUYER PROFILE] Break down value in three layers: LAYER 1 - DIRECT VALUE (What they receive): - Specific deliverable: [e.g., "30 LinkedIn posts"] - Format/quality: [e.g., "ready to publish, on-brand"] - Timeline: [e.g., "14 days, not 6 weeks if done internally"] LAYER 2 - ENABLED VALUE (What this lets them do): - Time saved: [calculate hours saved vs. doing themselves] - Resource freed: [what they can do with saved time] - Capability unlocked: [what they couldn't do before] - Risk avoided: [what problems prevented] LAYER 3 - ULTIMATE VALUE (Business impact): - Revenue influenced: [how this affects top line] - Cost reduced: [money saved on alternatives] - Competitive position: [market standing improvement] - Strategic goal advanced: [bigger objective supported] Example for "30 LinkedIn posts" to Series A founder: Layer 1: 30 publish-ready posts, on-brand voice, delivered in 14 days Layer 2: Saves 15 hours founder time (worth £3,000 at their rate), maintains consistency (builds authority), prevents random posting (protects brand) Layer 3: Consistent content → 3-5 investor conversations from visibility (potential £500k funding), founder time redirected to product (worth 2-3 weeks dev time), brand authority supports pricing power (intangible but real) Total value: £3,000 (time) + £X (investor meetings) + £X (product progress) = £5,000-10,000 value range Your price: £1,200 (12-24% of value created) Now calculate for YOUR offer: [Work through each layer with specific numbers/outcomes] This is what you're REALLY selling—not "content creation."

When clients balk at price, you're discussing Layer 1 (deliverable) while they're thinking effort cost. Shift conversation to Layer 2-3 (enabled and ultimate value). "Yes, it's £1,200 for 30 posts—but you're buying 15 hours back in your week, consistent visibility to investors, and protection against the brand damage of rushed, off-voice content. What's that worth to you?" The price suddenly feels small.

When to Raise Prices

Most service providers never raise prices out of fear. They eat inflation, improve offerings without charging more, and wonder why margins shrink. Price increases are normal and expected in professional services. Use ChatGPT to analyze when you've earned a raise: you've improved speed/quality, added new capabilities, generated proven results, or market rates have increased.

Price Increase Justification:

Evaluate if you've earned a price increase: CURRENT PRICING: - Package: [NAME] - Price: £[AMOUNT] - Been at this price since: [DATE] IMPROVEMENTS SINCE LAUNCH: 1. Speed: [Time to deliver now vs. then] 2. Quality: [Quality improvements made] 3. Results: [Client outcomes achieved] 4. Capabilities: [New skills/tools added] 5. Demand: [How busy are you?] MARKET CONTEXT: - Inflation since launch: [%] - Competitor pricing: [RANGE] - Your utilization: [% capacity booked] DECISION RULES: Raise if ANY of these true: □ Been >6 months at current price □ Booked >80% capacity for 2+ months □ Improved delivery speed >30% □ Generated measurable client ROI □ Competitors charge 20%+ more for similar How much to raise: - Standard increase: 15-20% (keeps most clients) - Significant improvement: 25-35% (grandfathers existing) - Market correction: 40-50% (expects some churn) For your situation: Current price: £[AMOUNT] Recommended new price: £[AMOUNT] ([%] increase) Reasoning: [SPECIFIC JUSTIFICATION] Grandfather existing clients? [YES/NO + timeframe] Announcement timing: [WHEN] Communication approach: [HOW]

Example: You launched LinkedIn content service at £800, 6 months ago. Delivery time improved from 18 days to 12 days due to better prompts. You're booked 5 weeks out. Competitors charge £1,200-1,500. Inflation is 6%. Result: raise to £1,000 (25% increase). Justify: "Due to increased demand and improved delivery speed, I'm updating pricing to £1,000 starting [DATE]. Your current project stays at £800—this applies to new bookings." Most clients understand; those who don't weren't profitable anyway.

Communicating Price Increases

Don't apologize for raises or hide behind "costs have gone up." State value delivered, new capabilities, market position. Frame as investment in quality, not inflation adjustment. Give notice (30-60 days), grandfather current clients for period (builds goodwill), and offer path to lock in old rate (encourages commitment).

Price Increase Email Template:

Subject: [YOUR SERVICE] pricing update - [EFFECTIVE DATE] Hi [CLIENT/LIST], Quick update on [YOUR SERVICE] pricing, effective [DATE - 60 DAYS OUT]: What's changing: [PACKAGE] increases from £[OLD] to £[NEW] ([%] increase) Why: Over the past [TIMEFRAME], we've [IMPROVEMENTS]: - [IMPROVEMENT 1 - e.g., "Cut delivery time from 18 to 12 days"] - [IMPROVEMENT 2 - e.g., "Added [FEATURE] based on your feedback"] - [IMPROVEMENT 3 - e.g., "Delivered [X] projects with [Y] average satisfaction"] Demand has grown significantly—we're currently booked [X] weeks out. This update reflects the value we're delivering and ensures we maintain quality as we scale. For you: - Current projects stay at current pricing - Book before [DATE] to lock in £[OLD] rate - Questions? [CALENDAR LINK] - happy to discuss Thanks for trusting us with your [SERVICE AREA]. [YOUR NAME] Keep tone confident, not apologetic. Focus on value, not "sorry, costs went up." Give options (lock in, ask questions). Most clients will accept without issue—those who don't weren't profitable long-term.

Building Your Upsell Ladder

The Three Upsell Types

Upsells increase deal value by offering more. Three categories work consistently: speed (deliver faster for premium), scope (add related deliverables), and support (increase access/hand-holding). Each appeals to different buyer motivations. Use ChatGPT to map which upsells fit your offer and buyer profile.

Upsell Opportunity Mapper:

Identify upsell opportunities for: BASE OFFER: [YOUR CURRENT PACKAGE] PRICE: £[AMOUNT] TYPICAL BUYER: [PROFILE] DELIVERY TIME: [DAYS] Analyze three upsell types: TYPE 1 - SPEED UPSELL: Concept: Deliver same scope faster Who wants this: Urgent timelines, last-minute needs, impatient buyers Offer: "[BASE] delivered in [REDUCED DAYS] instead of [NORMAL DAYS]" Price: +30-50% (urgency premium) Delivery cost: [Assess if feasible—may need to pause other work] Positioning: "Rush delivery available for [X]% premium" Example: Standard £1,200 package (14 days) → £1,800 Rush (7 days) TYPE 2 - SCOPE UPSELL: Concept: Add complementary deliverables Who wants this: Buyers who need complete solution, not partial Offer: "[BASE] + [RELATED DELIVERABLE]" Price: +40-60% (bundled efficiency) Delivery cost: [Additional work, but leverages existing context] Positioning: "Complete [OUTCOME] package" Example: £1,200 LinkedIn posts → £1,800 with email newsletter repurposing TYPE 3 - SUPPORT UPSELL: Concept: Increase access, guidance, or customization Who wants this: Less confident buyers, complex situations, premium brands Offer: "[BASE] + [EXTRA SUPPORT - calls/revisions/strategy]" Price: +50-80% (access premium) Delivery cost: [Your time, but maintains relationship] Positioning: "Premium guidance package" Example: £1,200 standard → £2,000 Premium (weekly calls + unlimited revisions) For YOUR offer, which type fits best? Rank 1-3, considering: - Buyer demand signals (do they ask for faster/more/guidance?) - Delivery feasibility (can you actually deliver?) - Margin impact (does math work?) Recommended upsell: Type: [SPEED/SCOPE/SUPPORT] Offer name: [PACKAGE NAME] Added value: [WHAT THEY GET] Price: £[AMOUNT] (base + [%]) Expected take rate: [20-30% of buyers] Margin: [CALCULATE]

Most successful first upsell: scope-based. Easier to sell (more value, not just speed), better margin (leverages existing work), and higher satisfaction (complete solution). Start here unless your buyers consistently express urgency signals.

Timing Your Upsell Offers

When you present the upsell matters as much as what you offer. Four proven moments: at proposal (package comparison), mid-delivery (momentum point), at completion (success continuation), and renewal (expand scope). Each moment has different buyer mindset and messaging requirements.

Upsell Timing Strategy:

Plan upsell presentation moments: MOMENT 1 - AT PROPOSAL (before purchase): Buyer mindset: Comparing options, deciding commitment level Upsell type: Present as package tier (Good/Better/Best from Module 1) Success rate: 20-30% choose higher tier when presented together Messaging: "Most clients choose [BETTER] for [REASON]" Example: "Standard at £1,200 or Complete at £1,800?" MOMENT 2 - MID-DELIVERY (during project): Buyer mindset: Engaged, seeing value, momentum building Upsell type: Natural expansion ("since we're already doing X...") Success rate: 15-25% if timing is right (after early win) Messaging: "Seeing great results—want to extend to [RELATED AREA]?" Example: "LinkedIn posts performing well—add Twitter repurposing for £600?" Timing: After delivering first milestone successfully MOMENT 3 - AT COMPLETION (project end): Buyer mindset: Satisfied (hopefully), evaluating next steps Upsell type: Continuation or new phase Success rate: 25-40% if project went well Messaging: "This solved [PROBLEM 1]—ready to tackle [PROBLEM 2]?" Example: "Content engine built—now optimize distribution? £1,500" Timing: Same day as final delivery MOMENT 4 - RENEWAL (ongoing relationship): Buyer mindset: Considering continuation, open to optimization Upsell type: Scope expansion or tier upgrade Success rate: 30-50% for proven relationships Messaging: "Let's expand results with [ENHANCEMENT]" Example: "Add quarterly strategy reviews to your retainer? +£800/month" Timing: 2 weeks before renewal date Choose 2 moments to focus on initially: Primary: [MOMENT] because [REASON] Secondary: [MOMENT] because [REASON] Build scripts/templates for each.

Creating Irresistible Upsell Offers

Weak upsells feel like sales tactics. Strong upsells feel like obvious next steps. The key: present upsells as problem-solving, not revenue-grabbing. Use ChatGPT to frame upsells around client goals, not your offerings.

Upsell Offer Script Generator:

Create upsell presentation script for: BASE PROJECT: [WHAT THEY BOUGHT] UPSELL OFFER: [WHAT YOU'RE PROPOSING] TIMING: [WHEN PRESENTING] CLIENT: [NAME/CONTEXT] Script structure: ACKNOWLEDGE SUCCESS (10 seconds): "[CLIENT], the [BASE PROJECT] is going really well. [SPECIFIC RESULT/FEEDBACK]." IDENTIFY NEXT OPPORTUNITY (15 seconds): "One thing I'm noticing: [OBSERVATION ABOUT THEIR SITUATION]." "This means [IMPLICATION - what they're missing/risking]." BRIDGE TO SOLUTION (10 seconds): "What if we extended this to also cover [UPSELL SCOPE]?" PAINT OUTCOME (15 seconds): "You'd get [SPECIFIC RESULT], which means [BENEFIT]." "Based on what we've achieved here, I'd expect [PREDICTED OUTCOME]." POSITION OFFER (10 seconds): "I can package this as [OFFER NAME] for £[AMOUNT]." "[TIMEFRAME] to deliver, same quality you're seeing now." SOFT CLOSE (10 seconds): "Does that sound valuable? Happy to sketch out details." OR "Want to see what that would look like specifically?" Total: 60-70 seconds, conversational tone AVOID: ✗ "Can I interest you in..." (salesy) ✗ "For only £X more..." (cheap tactics) ✗ "Most clients also buy..." (pressure) INSTEAD: ✓ Observation → Implication → Solution → Outcome ✓ Natural extension of current success ✓ Framed as serving their goal, not upselling Example for LinkedIn content client: "Sarah, the posts are performing really well—that 15k view post last week was exceptional. One thing I'm noticing: you're getting great visibility but the conversions to your email list seem low. This means you're building awareness but not capturing leads effectively. What if we extended this to also create a lead magnet and welcome sequence? You'd get a conversion funnel that turns post viewers into subscribers, which means those 15k views start building your list. Based on typical conversion rates, I'd expect 100-200 new subscribers monthly. I can package this as 'LinkedIn to Email Bridge' for £1,500. Two weeks to build the complete sequence. Does that sound valuable?" Now create script for YOUR upsell scenario: [Generate complete script]

Upsell Conversion Tracking

Track upsell performance religiously. Measure: offer rate (% of clients you present upsell to), acceptance rate (% who buy), average upsell value, and impact on lifetime value. This data tells you which upsells work and which to retire. Target: 30% acceptance rate on well-designed upsells.

Upsell Performance Dashboard:

Track monthly upsell metrics: OFFER METRICS: Total clients this month: [NUMBER] Upsell offers made: [NUMBER] Offer rate: [%] (offers / clients) Target: 60%+ (present to most clients) CONVERSION METRICS: Upsells accepted: [NUMBER] Acceptance rate: [%] (accepted / offers) Target: 30%+ REVENUE METRICS: Average upsell value: £[AMOUNT] Total upsell revenue: £[AMOUNT] Upsell revenue / total revenue: [%] Target: 25%+ of total revenue from upsells LIFETIME VALUE IMPACT: Average client value without upsell: £[AMOUNT] Average client value with upsell: £[AMOUNT] LTV increase: [%] Target: 40%+ LTV increase BY UPSELL TYPE: Type 1 [NAME]: [ACCEPTANCE RATE] - £[AVG VALUE] Type 2 [NAME]: [ACCEPTANCE RATE] - £[AVG VALUE] Type 3 [NAME]: [ACCEPTANCE RATE] - £[AVG VALUE] Winner: [HIGHEST PERFORMING] Retire: [LOWEST PERFORMING IF <15%] INSIGHTS: - Which timing moments work best? - Which client types accept most? - What objections appear repeatedly? - How to improve offer rate? Action items: 1. [IMPROVEMENT BASED ON DATA] 2. [IMPROVEMENT BASED ON DATA] 3. [IMPROVEMENT BASED ON DATA]

Extending Customer Lifetime

Cross-Sell vs. Upsell: Know the Difference

Upsell: more of the same (bigger package, faster delivery, more support). Cross-sell: different but related service. Example: client bought LinkedIn content (original). Upsell: add more posts or faster turnaround. Cross-sell: add email newsletter using different format/channel. Both increase revenue, but cross-sell diversifies your relationship and makes you stickier.

Designing Complementary Offers

Strong cross-sells solve adjacent problems revealed during delivery. Use ChatGPT to map the customer journey and identify natural next steps. The best cross-sells feel inevitable, not opportunistic.

Cross-Sell Opportunity Mapping:

Map cross-sell opportunities from: PRIMARY OFFER: [YOUR CORE SERVICE] TYPICAL OUTCOMES: [WHAT CLIENTS ACHIEVE] COMMON FEEDBACK: [WHAT THEY SAY DURING/AFTER] Analyze customer journey: BEFORE YOUR SERVICE: Problem: [WHAT PAIN BROUGHT THEM] Attempts: [WHAT THEY TRIED] Gaps: [WHAT THEY STILL LACK] DURING YOUR SERVICE: Discovery: [WHAT YOU LEARN ABOUT THEM] Related challenges: [OTHER ISSUES MENTIONED] Bottlenecks: [WHAT SLOWS RESULTS] AFTER YOUR SERVICE: Achieved: [WHAT THEY GOT] Next logical step: [WHAT HAPPENS NEXT] New problems surfaced: [WHAT'S NOW VISIBLE] Cross-sell candidates: OPTION 1 - PREREQUISITE SERVICE: What: [SERVICE THAT SHOULD HAPPEN FIRST] Why: Helps them get more from your core offer Example: "Brand voice guide before content creation" Price range: 30-50% of core offer Margin: High (mostly ChatGPT-driven) OPTION 2 - EXTENSION SERVICE: What: [SERVICE THAT FOLLOWS NATURALLY] Why: Maximizes value of core deliverables Example: "Distribution strategy after content creation" Price range: 60-80% of core offer Margin: Medium (mix of ChatGPT + strategy) OPTION 3 - PARALLEL SERVICE: What: [RELATED SERVICE, DIFFERENT CHANNEL] Why: Diversifies their approach Example: "Email content parallel to LinkedIn content" Price range: 80-100% of core offer Margin: High (leverages existing context) OPTION 4 - MAINTENANCE SERVICE: What: [ONGOING SUPPORT/OPTIMIZATION] Why: Protects investment, ensures results Example: "Monthly content refresh + performance review" Price range: 20-30% of core offer, recurring Margin: Very high (small effort, retained revenue) Best cross-sell for YOUR offer: Type: [OPTION NUMBER] Service name: [WHAT YOU'LL CALL IT] Value prop: [WHY THEY NEED IT] Price: £[AMOUNT] Expected attach rate: [% OF CORE CLIENTS WHO'LL BUY] Annual revenue potential: [CALCULATE] When to present: Timing: [PROJECT STAGE] Trigger: [WHAT SIGNALS NEED] Script: [HOW TO INTRODUCE]

Example: You sell "LinkedIn Content Package" at £1,200. During delivery, clients consistently ask "how do I track what's working?" This reveals need. Cross-sell: "Content Analytics Dashboard + Monthly Review" at £400/month. Positions as protecting their £1,200 investment. Expected attach rate: 40% of clients who see strong engagement. Annual value: £1,200 (project) + £4,800 (12 months analytics) = £6,000 LTV per client.

Retainer Models That Stick

Retainers convert one-time projects into recurring revenue. Two models work: capacity-based (X deliverables per month) or outcome-based (ongoing optimization toward goal). Use ChatGPT to design retainers that balance predictability for you with flexibility for client.

Retainer Package Designer:

Design retainer offer from: YOUR PROJECT SERVICE: [ONE-TIME DELIVERABLE] PROJECT PRICE: £[AMOUNT] PROJECT DURATION: [DAYS/WEEKS] Convert to monthly retainer: MODEL 1 - CAPACITY RETAINER: Structure: Fixed monthly deliverable volume Example: "10 posts per month + 2 strategy reviews" Pricing: 70-80% of equivalent project rate (discount for commitment) Calculation: - Monthly deliverable value: £[AMOUNT] - Retainer discount: -20% - Monthly price: £[AMOUNT] Benefits: Predictable for both sides, clear scope Risk: Can feel transactional, volume focus MODEL 2 - OUTCOME RETAINER: Structure: Ongoing optimization toward KPI Example: "Grow engaged followers 15% quarterly" Pricing: Value-based on outcome worth Calculation: - Quarterly outcome value: £[AMOUNT TO CLIENT] - Your fee: 15-25% of value created - Monthly retainer: £[AMOUNT] Benefits: Aligned incentives, premium pricing Risk: Requires measurable outcomes, longer sales cycle MODEL 3 - HYBRID RETAINER: Structure: Base deliverables + performance bonus Example: "8 posts monthly + bonus if engagement >20%" Pricing: Base + variable Calculation: - Base (80% of capacity model): £[AMOUNT] - Performance bonus: +£[AMOUNT] if goals hit - Average monthly: £[AMOUNT] Benefits: Predictability with upside, client loves results focus Risk: More complex to administer Recommended model for YOUR service: Type: [1/2/3] Monthly retainer: £[AMOUNT] What's included: - [DELIVERABLE 1] - [DELIVERABLE 2] - [DELIVERABLE 3] - [SUPPORT/ACCESS LEVEL] Contract terms: - Minimum commitment: [3/6/12 months] - Payment: Monthly in advance - Cancellation: [30/60/90 days notice] - Price lock: [12 months] Positioning script: "Now that [PROJECT] is working, let's keep momentum with ongoing support. For £[AMOUNT]/month, you get [DELIVERABLES] plus [SUPPORT]. Most clients see [OUTCOME] within [TIMEFRAME] on this plan. [COMMITMENT] minimum—lock in current pricing before the next increase." Expected conversion: 25-35% of successful projects

Audits and Assessments as Entry Points

Low-commitment audits (£300-800) generate high-value projects. Client buys "Content Audit" for £500, you analyze their current approach with ChatGPT, deliver findings with recommendations. Natural next step: "Fix everything we found" project at £2,500. Audits work because they're low-risk purchases that surface need.

Audit Offer Template:

Design audit/assessment offer: AUDIT FOCUS: [AREA YOU'LL ANALYZE] TARGET CLIENT: [WHO NEEDS THIS] TIME TO DELIVER: [DAYS] Audit structure: DELIVERABLE: Format: [PDF REPORT / LOOM / DECK] Length: [PAGES OR MINUTES] Sections: 1. Current state analysis (what they're doing now) 2. Gap identification (what's missing/wrong) 3. Prioritized recommendations (what to fix first) 4. Implementation roadmap (how to fix) Analysis method (using ChatGPT): - Collect: [WHAT YOU REVIEW - content, data, process] - Analyze: [WHAT YOU EVALUATE AGAINST - best practices, benchmarks] - Score: [RATING SYSTEM - what's working/not] - Recommend: [ACTION ITEMS - specific improvements] Example for "LinkedIn Content Audit": 1. Review last 30 posts for: hooks, structure, CTAs, engagement 2. Compare to high-performing posts in their niche 3. Score each post 1-10 on effectiveness 4. Identify top 5 improvement opportunities 5. Recommend specific template/approach changes Pricing: DIY Audit: £[LOWER] - Report only, they implement Guided Audit: £[MIDDLE] - Report + 1-hour review call Full Service: £[HIGHER] - Audit + 30-day implementation Standard pricing: £[AMOUNT] for [DELIVERABLE] Upsell path: "Want us to implement these recommendations? [NEXT SERVICE] £[AMOUNT]" Conversion funnel: Audit buyer → 40-60% buy implementation Audit fee: £[AMOUNT] Implementation project: £[AMOUNT] Average customer value: £[AUDIT + (0.5 × IMPLEMENTATION)] Position as: "Before you commit to [BIG PROJECT], let's audit [AREA] to identify exact gaps. £[AMOUNT], [TIMEFRAME] turnaround. Then you decide next steps."

Building Your Revenue Forecast

Simple Revenue Model in Sheets

You need a revenue forecast that shows realistic path to income goals. Use ChatGPT to build a simple model with your pricing, expected volume, and conversion rates. This helps you see: how many clients you need, which offers drive most revenue, where to focus effort, and when you hit target income.

Revenue Model Template:

Build monthly revenue model: OFFERS & PRICING: Offer 1: [NAME] - £[GBP] ($[USD]) Offer 2: [NAME] - £[GBP] ($[USD]) Offer 3: [NAME] - £[GBP] ($[USD]) Upsell: [NAME] - £[GBP] ($[USD]) Retainer: [NAME] - £[GBP]/month ($[USD]/month) VOLUME ASSUMPTIONS: Month 1-2 (Building phase): - Leads generated: [NUMBER] - Calls booked: [NUMBER] - Conversion rate: [%] - New clients: [NUMBER] Month 3-4 (Growing phase): - Leads generated: [NUMBER] - Calls booked: [NUMBER] - Conversion rate: [%] - New clients: [NUMBER] Month 5-6 (Scaling phase): - Leads generated: [NUMBER] - Calls booked: [NUMBER] - Conversion rate: [%] - New clients: [NUMBER] REVENUE CALCULATION: MONTH 1: Project revenue: [CLIENTS] × £[AVG PRICE] = £[TOTAL] Upsell revenue: [PROJECTS] × [TAKE RATE %] × £[UPSELL PRICE] = £[TOTAL] Retainer revenue: [CLIENTS ON RETAINER] × £[MONTHLY] = £[TOTAL] Total Month 1: £[TOTAL] ($[USD]) MONTH 2: [REPEAT CALCULATION] + Retainer carryover: [CONTINUING CLIENTS] × £[MONTHLY] Total Month 2: £[TOTAL] ($[USD]) [CONTINUE FOR 6-12 MONTHS] CUMULATIVE: 6-Month total: £[TOTAL] ($[USD]) Average monthly: £[TOTAL] ($[USD]) Highest month: £[TOTAL] ($[USD]) REALITY CHECKS: □ Is lead volume achievable with your outreach capacity? □ Is conversion rate realistic given your close rate? □ Is client volume deliverable given your time? □ Is upsell take rate based on actual data or hope? □ Does retainer growth account for churn? OPTIMIZATION OPPORTUNITIES: If below target: - Increase price: +[%] raises revenue £[AMOUNT] - Improve conversion: +[%] adds [NUMBER] clients = £[AMOUNT] - Add upsell: [TAKE RATE]% of [CLIENTS] = £[AMOUNT] - Launch retainer: [NUMBER] clients = £[AMOUNT]/month Build this in Google Sheets with: - GBP primary, USD mirror column - Conservative/realistic/optimistic scenarios - Monthly breakdown for 12 months - Charts showing revenue ramp

The £10k/Month Breakdown

Many aim for £10k monthly revenue. Let's reverse-engineer what that requires with different pricing strategies. Use ChatGPT to model multiple paths to the same goal—helps you pick the easiest route.

£10k Month Scenarios:

Calculate paths to £10,000/month: SCENARIO 1 - HIGH VOLUME, LOW PRICE: Offer: £500 projects Required: 20 projects/month (5 per week) Leads needed: 100 (assuming 20% conversion) Delivery capacity: 10 hours/project = 200 hours/month Reality: Possible but exhausting, thin margin SCENARIO 2 - MODERATE VOLUME, MODERATE PRICE: Offer: £1,500 projects Required: 7 projects/month (~2 per week) Leads needed: 35 (assuming 20% conversion) Delivery capacity: 12 hours/project = 84 hours/month Reality: Sustainable for solo operator SCENARIO 3 - LOW VOLUME, HIGH PRICE: Offer: £3,000 projects Required: 3-4 projects/month (1 per week) Leads needed: 15-20 (assuming 20% conversion) Delivery capacity: 20 hours/project = 60-80 hours/month Reality: Best margin, requires strong positioning SCENARIO 4 - RETAINER FOCUSED: Offer: £2,000/month retainers Required: 5 retainer clients New clients needed: 1-2 per month to account for churn Delivery capacity: 15 hours/client = 75 hours/month Reality: Most predictable, best for scaling SCENARIO 5 - HYBRID MODEL: Base: 3 × £2,000 retainers = £6,000 Projects: 2 × £1,500 = £3,000 Upsells: 3 × £400 = £1,200 Total: £10,200/month Reality: Diversified revenue, balanced work Recommended path for most: Start: Scenario 2 (moderate volume/price) Month 1-3: Focus on project delivery Month 4-6: Convert best clients to retainers (Scenario 4) Month 7+: Transition to hybrid model (Scenario 5) Your path to £10k: Current revenue: £[AMOUNT]/month Gap to fill: £[AMOUNT] Chosen scenario: [NUMBER] Actions needed: 1. [SPECIFIC CHANGE - price/volume/upsell] 2. [SPECIFIC CHANGE] 3. [SPECIFIC CHANGE] Timeline: [MONTHS] to reach £10k/month

Lab: Build Your Growth Levers

Exercise 1: Price Increase Plan

Using the price increase justification framework, analyze your current pricing. Have you earned a raise? If yes, plan the increase: new prices, effective date, communication approach, grandfather policy. If no, identify what improvements would justify 20% increase and timeline to implement them.

Exercise 2: Design One Upsell

Pick your most popular package. Use the upsell opportunity mapper to design ONE compelling upsell. Create the offer, price it, write the presentation script, and identify the timing moment. Test it on your next 3 clients and track acceptance rate.

Exercise 3: Build Revenue Model

Create a 6-month revenue forecast in Google Sheets. Include your current offers, realistic volume assumptions, upsell rates, and retainer growth. Calculate monthly revenue in GBP with USD conversion. Identify the gap between current trajectory and your income goal, then model what changes close that gap (price increase, better conversion, upsell implementation).

Exercise 4: Design 90-Day Success Plan

This becomes a premium add-on you sell. Use ChatGPT to create a template "90-Day Success Plan" that helps clients maximize results from your core service. Include: week-by-week milestones, success metrics to track, optimization recommendations, monthly review structure. Price this at 40-50% of your core offer and present at project completion.

90-Day Success Plan Template:

Create 90-Day Success Plan for: CORE SERVICE: [WHAT THEY BOUGHT] DELIVERABLE: [WHAT THEY RECEIVED] CLIENT GOAL: [WHAT THEY WANT TO ACHIEVE] Plan structure: WEEK 1-4: FOUNDATION PHASE Goal: Implement deliverables, establish baseline Milestones: - Week 1: [SPECIFIC ACTION] - Week 2: [SPECIFIC ACTION] - Week 3: [SPECIFIC ACTION] - Week 4: [SPECIFIC ACTION] Success metrics: [WHAT TO MEASURE] Review checkpoint: End of Week 4 call WEEK 5-8: OPTIMIZATION PHASE Goal: Refine based on early data, maximize performance Milestones: - Week 5: [SPECIFIC ACTION] - Week 6: [SPECIFIC ACTION] - Week 7: [SPECIFIC ACTION] - Week 8: [SPECIFIC ACTION] Success metrics: [IMPROVEMENT TARGETS] Review checkpoint: End of Week 8 call WEEK 9-12: SCALING PHASE Goal: Expand what's working, prepare for ongoing execution Milestones: - Week 9: [SPECIFIC ACTION] - Week 10: [SPECIFIC ACTION] - Week 11: [SPECIFIC ACTION] - Week 12: [SPECIFIC ACTION] Success metrics: [FINAL TARGETS] Review checkpoint: End of Week 12 call + roadmap INCLUDED SUPPORT: - 3 strategy calls (weeks 4, 8, 12) - Email/Slack access for questions - Monthly performance report - Optimization recommendations DELIVERABLE FORMAT: - PDF roadmap (8-10 pages) - Milestone checklist - Metrics tracking sheet - Call recording summaries PRICING: Standalone: £[800-1200] Or bundle with core service: +£[600-800] Positioning: "The [CORE SERVICE] gives you the assets—this plan ensures you actually achieve [GOAL] with them. Most clients see [OUTCOME] within 90 days."

Monetization Opportunities

Pricing Strategy as High-Value Consulting

The pricing, packaging, and upsell strategies you just learned are themselves a valuable consulting service. Many businesses have decent offerings but terrible monetization: underpriced, no upsells, leaking revenue. You can sell pricing optimization as a strategic engagement that typically increases client revenue 20-40% without changing their core service.

Service Package: Revenue Architecture Design

Done-with-you engagement where you analyze their current monetization, identify leakage points, redesign pricing structure, create upsell/cross-sell offers, and build revenue forecasting model. This isn't generic advice—it's customized strategy with implementation templates.

  • Phase 1 - Revenue Audit (Week 1): Analyze current pricing, package structure, sales data, client feedback. Interview 3-5 clients about price perception. Calculate current LTV, margin, and revenue leakage points. Deliverable: 10-page audit report with gaps identified.
  • Phase 2 - Strategy Design (Week 2): Value ladder mapping for their offers. Redesign package tiers using good-better-best framework. Create 2-3 upsell offers with presentation scripts. Design retainer model if applicable. Deliverable: Complete pricing architecture document.
  • Phase 3 - Revenue Modeling (Week 3): Build 12-month revenue forecast in Google Sheets. Model impact of price increases, upsell implementation, retainer adoption. Scenario planning (conservative/realistic/optimistic). Deliverable: Working revenue model with projections.
  • Phase 4 - Implementation Support (Week 4-6): Create client communication templates (price increase, upsell scripts, retainer pitch). Train their team on new pricing conversations. 30-day implementation support to handle objections and optimize messaging. Deliverable: Complete implementation toolkit.

Pricing Structure:

Solopreneur: £3,500 ($4,375) - One service line, pricing redesign, basic model, 30-day support

Small Business (2-10 team): £7,500 ($9,375) - Multiple offers, complete revenue architecture, team training, 60-day support

Agency/Enterprise (11+): £15,000 ($18,750) - Full revenue transformation, multi-tier pricing, sales training program, 90-day support + quarterly reviews

Why This Commands Premium Fees

Pricing optimization has immediate, measurable ROI. A business doing £150k annually with 30% margin is netting £45k. Your pricing redesign adds 20% revenue (£30k) and improves margin 10 points (40% margin on £180k = £72k net, up from £45k). Impact: +£27k annual profit. Your £7,500 fee pays for itself in 3 months, then generates £20k+ ongoing benefit annually. This is one of the easiest consulting sells because ROI is obvious and fast.

Position it: "Most service businesses leak 20-30% of potential revenue through underpricing and missed upsell opportunities. We'll audit your monetization, redesign your pricing architecture, and build your upsell system. Typical impact: 25% revenue increase within 90 days. Investment: £[AMOUNT]. If we don't identify at least 3x ROI potential, full refund." The guarantee is safe because the opportunities are almost always there—you're just making them visible.

Ongoing Optimization Retainer

After initial implementation, offer quarterly pricing reviews at £2,000/quarter ($2,500). Each quarter you: analyze performance data from previous period, recommend adjustments to pricing/packaging, design seasonal offers or limited-time upsells, update revenue model with actuals, and provide market intelligence on competitor pricing. This becomes predictable consulting income that helps clients continuously optimize monetization.

MODULE 7: Capstone Sprint - £1,000 in 14 Days

Prove product-market fit with real cash collected fast—executing a focused 14-day sprint that validates your offer, tests your systems, and generates £1,000+ in revenue using everything you've built.

Your Sprint Mission

This isn't theory—it's a real revenue sprint with clear rules, daily targets, and accountability. You'll execute one offer through one channel with daily outreach and shipping. By day 14, you'll have cash collected, testimonials captured, systems validated, and proof your business model works. This is where everything comes together.

Revenue Target

£1,000+

Sprint Duration

14 Days

Success Deliverables

5

The Sprint Rules

Why 14 Days and £1,000?

The timeframe is intentionally short to force focus and prevent perfectionism. Two weeks is long enough to execute a complete sales cycle (outreach → call → proposal → close → deliver) but short enough that you can't procrastinate. The £1,000 target (roughly $1,250 USD) is achievable with 1-2 clients at moderate pricing, proving you can generate revenue without requiring viral growth or huge volume.

This sprint has five non-negotiable rules that ensure real results, not fake progress. Breaking any rule means starting over—harsh but necessary for genuine validation.

The Five Sprint Rules

Sprint Rules (Print and Post):

CAPSTONE SPRINT - NON-NEGOTIABLE RULES RULE 1: ONE OFFER ONLY - Pick ONE package from your Good-Better-Best matrix - No pivoting, no testing alternatives mid-sprint - If it's not selling, improve messaging—don't change offer - Why: Focus beats scattered effort every time RULE 2: ONE CHANNEL ONLY - Pick ONE lead gen channel (LinkedIn, email, partnerships, or content) - Commit fully—no jumping to "easier" channel when hard - Master one before adding second - Why: Depth over breadth wins in tight timeframes RULE 3: DAILY OUTREACH - 30 meaningful touches minimum every weekday - "Meaningful" = personalized, relevant, value-first - No mass blasts, no generic templates - Track: Every message sent counts toward daily target - Why: Consistency compounds, sporadic effort wastes time RULE 4: DAILY SHIPPING - Deliver SOMETHING every day (even if small) - Prospect replies? Respond same day - Call booked? Confirm and prep same day - Project milestone? Ship on deadline, no delays - Why: Speed creates momentum, delays kill deals RULE 5: CASH COLLECTED = SUCCESS - Revenue target is COLLECTED money, not signed contracts - Deposit counts, full payment counts, invoices don't - Track daily: How much money is actually in your account? - Why: Real validation requires real cash exchange SPRINT FAILURE CONDITIONS: These invalidate the sprint—must restart: - Miss 3+ days of outreach (Rule 3 violation) - Change core offer mid-sprint (Rule 1 violation) - Fail to ship on committed deadlines (Rule 4 violation) - End sprint without collecting ANY money (Rule 5 failure) POST THESE RULES WHERE YOU WORK Review every morning before starting daily tasks

Pre-Sprint Setup Checklist

Before day 1, ensure these foundations are ready. The sprint moves fast—no time to build infrastructure mid-execution. Use ChatGPT to audit your readiness and identify gaps.

Sprint Readiness Audit:

Complete this checklist BEFORE starting sprint: OFFER READY: □ One package selected from Good-Better-Best □ Price confirmed (£[AMOUNT]) □ Deliverables clearly defined □ Timeline documented (X days delivery) □ Value proposition tested (can explain in 60 seconds) ASSETS READY: □ One-page offer sheet (from Module 1) □ Mini-deck (3 slides) for calls □ Proposal template with pricing □ SOW/kickoff packet template □ Case study or proof asset (even if from pilot/demo) SYSTEMS READY: □ Lead gen channel chosen and tested □ Target list of 100+ qualified prospects □ Outreach messages written (10+ variations) □ Calendar booking link active □ Pipeline tracker set up (CRM or sheet) □ Delivery workflow documented □ Payment method configured (Stripe, PayPal, bank transfer) CHATGPT PROMPTS READY: □ Discovery call script loaded □ Proposal generator tested □ Outreach message variations saved □ Follow-up sequences prepared □ Weekly update template ready TIME BLOCKED: □ 2-3 hours daily for outreach (same time each day) □ 1 hour daily for follow-up/admin □ Call slots available (at least 3-4 per week) □ Delivery time protected (if close early) ACCOUNTABILITY: □ Sprint scorecard printed □ Daily tracking method chosen □ Someone knows you're doing this (accountability partner) □ Reward planned for hitting £1,000 target If ANY box unchecked: Fix before starting sprint. Sprint only works if foundation is solid. Use ChatGPT to fill gaps: "I need to complete [UNCHECKED ITEM]. Here's my current state: [CONTEXT]. Generate what I need to be sprint-ready."

The 14-Day Breakdown

Days 1-2: Build Pipeline

First 48 hours focus on filling your pipeline with qualified prospects. The goal is 100 contacts in your CRM by end of day 2. These aren't random names—they're ICP-matched, researched, and ready for personalized outreach. Use ChatGPT to accelerate list building and initial research.

Days 1-2 Objectives:

DAY 1 - LIST BUILDING (Target: 50 contacts) Morning (2 hours): - Review ICP from Module 1 - Source 50 qualified contacts using chosen channel - Add to pipeline tracker with: name, company, title, signal - Verify each matches ICP (use validation checklist) Afternoon (2 hours): - Research each contact (LinkedIn, company site, recent activity) - Document 1-2 signals per contact (hiring, growth, content, tech) - Tag with best outreach angle (3 angles from Module 3) - Prioritize top 20 by strength of signal Evening (1 hour): - Prepare 10 personalized messages for top contacts - Schedule 5 to send tomorrow morning - Review: Can you articulate why each contact is good fit? Success metric: 50 qualified contacts in pipeline, 10 messages drafted --- DAY 2 - OUTREACH BEGINS (Target: 50 more contacts + 30 touches) Morning (2 hours): - Send 5 prepared messages from yesterday - Build 50 additional contacts (total: 100 in pipeline) - Prioritize and research top 25 from new batch Afternoon (2 hours): - Craft and send 25 more personalized messages (total: 30 touches today) - Log all sends in pipeline tracker - Monitor replies (respond within 2 hours to any responses) Evening (1 hour): - Prepare 15 messages for Day 3 - Review response rate: [RESPONSES] / [SENT] = [%] - If <5% response rate: revise messaging (too generic?) Success metric: 100 total contacts, 30 outreach touches, 1-2 replies CHATGPT PROMPT FOR BATCH RESEARCH: "I have 10 prospects: [LIST NAMES/COMPANIES]. For each, analyze their LinkedIn/website/recent news and identify: 1. Strongest buying signal (hiring, growth, pain point) 2. Best outreach angle (problem, growth, content engagement) 3. Personalization hook (specific reference point) Format as table for easy reference."

Days 3-5: Book Discovery Calls

These three days are pure volume: outreach, follow-up, response handling, call booking. Target is 3 booked calls by end of day 5. This requires 90+ total touches (30/day) and aggressive follow-up on any engagement. Use ChatGPT to generate message variations so you're never repeating yourself.

Days 3-5 Objectives:

DAY 3 - VOLUME OUTREACH (Target: 30 touches, 1 call booked) Daily routine: Morning (90 min): - Send 15 pre-written messages - Follow up on Day 1-2 non-responders (second touch) - Respond to any overnight replies Midday (60 min): - Research and message 10 new contacts - Update pipeline: move responders to "Engaged" stage - Prep for any booked calls Afternoon (90 min): - Send 5 more messages - Engage with prospect content (LinkedIn comments, shares) - Identify warm leads for phone/video outreach if available Success: 30 touches, 2-3 replies, 1 call booked --- DAY 4 - FOLLOW-UP SURGE (Target: 30 touches, 1 more call) Focus: Convert engaged prospects to calls Morning: - 20 messages to new prospects - 10 follow-ups to recent responders (move convo forward) Key tactic: When someone replies positively but doesn't book: "Great—do any of these times work? [3 SPECIFIC OPTIONS + CALENDAR LINK]" Don't let positive responses die in "let's find a time" limbo Success: 30 touches, 2 calls total booked --- DAY 5 - CALL PREP + CONTINUE OUTREACH (Target: 30 touches, 3 calls total) Morning: - 30 outreach touches (now routine) - Prep for booked calls: review discovery script, research client Afternoon: - Conduct any booked calls - Send same-day follow-up to calls - Continue outreach to maintain momentum Success: 3 calls booked (even if not all conducted yet), pipeline flowing RESPONSE RATE CHECK: Total sent Days 1-5: ~150 messages Expected replies: 8-15 (5-10% response rate) Expected calls booked: 3-5 If below target: □ Are messages too generic? (Add more personalization) □ Is CTA too vague? (Make booking easier) □ Is timing off? (Try different send times) □ Are contacts truly qualified? (Revisit ICP) Use ChatGPT to diagnose: "Here are 3 messages I sent and their responses [or lack of]. What's weak? How do I improve?"

Days 6-9: Discovery, Demo, Propose

Middle phase is about conversion: conducting discovery calls, running demos, sending proposals. Target is 2 proposals sent by day 9. This requires tight execution—same-day proposal turnaround is critical for maintaining momentum. Use your ChatGPT systems from Module 4 to deliver fast without sacrificing quality.

Days 6-9 Objectives:

DAY 6-7 - DISCOVERY CALLS + PROPOSALS For each call: Before call (15 min): - Review discovery script (Module 4) - Research prospect's business - Prepare 3 questions specific to their situation - Test tech (Zoom/calendar) During call (20-30 min): - Execute BANT framework (Budget, Authority, Need, Timeline) - Listen 70%, talk 30% - Take notes on pain points, outcomes wanted, timeline - If qualified: "I'll send proposal today with specific recommendations" After call (30 min): - Send thank-you email immediately - Use ChatGPT proposal generator with discovery notes - Customize proposal with their specific language - Send within 2 hours of call ending - Include: problem recap, solution, deliverables, timeline, price, next steps Same-day proposal formula: "Hi [NAME], great talking earlier. As discussed, here's the proposal for [THEIR PROJECT]. [Attach 2-page proposal PDF] Key points: - [DELIVERABLE] delivered in [TIMELINE] - £[PRICE] investment - Start date: [DATE] Available for quick call if helpful: [CALENDAR] Otherwise, let me know by [DATE] and we'll kick off." Target: 2 calls conducted, 2 proposals sent by end of Day 7 --- DAY 8-9 - FOLLOW-UP + CONTINUE PIPELINE Proposal follow-up: T+24 hours: Value-add email (additional insight, relevant example) T+48 hours: Direct check-in (are you ready to move forward?) Continue outreach: - Don't stop filling pipeline while waiting on proposals - 30 touches per day maintains momentum - Book more calls for later in sprint Negotiation/objections: If prospect raises concerns, use objection framework (Module 4): - Validate concern - Reframe with perspective - Ask clarifying question - Propose path forward Target: 2 proposals out, 1-2 more calls booked, pipeline still flowing CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTOR: Speed. Proposals sent same day. Follow-ups sent on schedule. Prospects feel your responsiveness and professionalism. Slow responses = lost deals. Fast responses = "this person is on it" confidence.

Days 10-12: Close and Deliver

Final push to close deals and begin delivery. By now you should have 1-2 proposals in review. Follow up aggressively but professionally. If someone says yes, collect deposit immediately (same day) and begin work. Use ChatGPT to manage delivery workflow while maintaining outreach—you're now juggling sales and fulfillment.

Days 10-12 Objectives:

DAY 10 - CLOSING PUSH For proposals in play: - Final follow-up: "Wanted to close the loop on [PROJECT]. Ready to move forward?" - If yes: "Great! Here's payment link for deposit [STRIPE/PAYPAL]. Once received, we'll kick off [DATE]." - If hesitation: Address specific concern, offer call to discuss - If no: "Understood—wrong timing. Keep me in mind for [FUTURE SCENARIO]." (Ask for referral) Deposit collection: - Minimum 30% upfront (protects you) - 50% upfront preferred (proves commitment) - Payment same day as verbal yes (momentum) Track: £[AMOUNT] collected so far toward £1,000 target Continue outreach: - 30 touches (yes, still—never stop until target hit) - More calls booking for Days 11-13 --- DAY 11 - DELIVERY BEGINS + SALES CONTINUE For closed clients: - Send kickoff packet (Module 5) - Schedule kickoff call (30 min) - Begin production using ChatGPT workflows - Send first update (even if just "started, here's plan") Sales pipeline: - Conduct new discovery calls - Send new proposals (same-day rule) - Follow up on outstanding proposals Balancing act: You're now doing TWO jobs: selling and delivering. Time allocation: - Morning: Delivery (2 hours) - Afternoon: Sales (2 hours) This is real business—manage both or nothing works. --- DAY 12 - MILESTONE DELIVERY + CLOSING MORE Deliver something to client: - First draft, progress update, partial deliverable - Whatever shows momentum - Use weekly update format even though early Close second deal: - If first deal was £500-800, you need one more - If first deal was £1,200+, upsell counts toward target - Be honest with prospects: "I'm running focused sprint, limited spots this week" (Creates urgency—true constraint) Track: £[AMOUNT] collected. Gap to £1,000: £[AMOUNT] Success metric: At least £600-800 collected by end of Day 12 If below £500: Sprint is at risk—need aggressive closing Days 13-14

Days 13-14: Final Push and Testimonials

Last 48 hours are about crossing finish line. If you're close to £1,000, close remaining deals and collect. If you're at/past target, focus on delivery excellence and testimonial capture. Either way, prepare for sprint review and next phase planning.

Days 13-14 Objectives:

DAY 13 - CLOSE GAPS If BELOW £1,000: - Review pipeline: Who's closest to yes? - Make calls (phone, not email) to warm leads - Offer fast-start incentive: "Book by tonight, start tomorrow" - Be direct: "I'm closing my sprint tomorrow—this week only for [PACKAGE] at [PRICE]" - Consider: Accept smaller deposit (20%) to get deal done - Worst case: Offer audit/assessment (£300-500) to hit target If AT/ABOVE £1,000: - Ensure all deposits cleared (check bank, not just invoiced) - Focus on delivery quality - Continue outreach (momentum carries beyond sprint) Either way: - Deliver value to current clients (they're your testimonials) - Document everything for sprint review --- DAY 14 - SPRINT COMPLETION Morning routine: - Final delivery push for current clients - Send updates showing progress - Request feedback: "How's the experience so far?" Afternoon: - Calculate final revenue: £[TOTAL COLLECTED] - Complete sprint scorecard (see below) - Request testimonials from satisfied clients: "[CLIENT], quick request: Would you write 2-3 sentences about working together? Specifically: What problem you had, why you chose us, what result you're seeing. I'll use this to help others with similar challenges." Evening - Sprint Review: Using ChatGPT, analyze: 1. What worked? (channel, messaging, pricing, delivery) 2. What didn't? (where did friction appear?) 3. What surprised you? (unexpected learnings) 4. What's next? (how to scale from here) SPRINT SUCCESS CRITERIA: □ £1,000+ collected (cash in account) □ 2+ testimonials captured □ 1+ client delivered initial milestone □ Systems validated (prompts, workflows, pricing worked) □ Next 30 days planned (how to scale) If target not hit: - Where did process break? (outreach volume? conversion? closing?) - What would you change for Sprint 2? - When will you run Sprint 2? (schedule it now) CELEBRATION: You planned a reward for hitting target—claim it. This was hard work. Acknowledge the achievement.

Daily Scorecard and Metrics

The Sprint Scorecard

Track these metrics daily. Print the scorecard and fill it in each evening. This creates accountability and reveals patterns—you'll see exactly where deals progress or stall. Use ChatGPT to analyze your scorecard mid-sprint and recommend adjustments.

Daily Tracking Template:

CAPSTONE SPRINT SCORECARD Print this. Fill daily. Review weekly. ───────────────────────────────────────────── DAY [#] - [DATE] ───────────────────────────────────────────── ACTIVITY METRICS: Outreach touches today: [____] (Target: 30) Replies received: [____] Calls booked: [____] Calls conducted: [____] Proposals sent: [____] Follow-ups sent: [____] PIPELINE STATUS: Leads (not contacted): [____] Engaged (responded): [____] Calls booked: [____] Proposals out: [____] Closed: [____] REVENUE TRACKING: New deposits collected today: £[____] Running total collected: £[____] Gap to £1,000 target: £[____] DELIVERY STATUS: Projects in progress: [____] Milestones delivered today: [____] Client updates sent: [____] WINS TODAY: [Note 1-2 specific wins, even small ones] BLOCKERS/ISSUES: [Note anything slowing progress] NEXT DAY PRIORITY: [Top 3 tasks for tomorrow] ───────────────────────────────────────────── WEEKLY ROLLUP (Days 1-7, Days 8-14): Total outreach: [____] (Target: 210 for 7 days) Total replies: [____] (Response rate: [___]%) Total calls booked: [____] Total calls conducted: [____] Total proposals sent: [____] Conversion rate (proposals → closed): [____]% Revenue collected: £[____] PATTERN ANALYSIS: Best performing outreach angle: [____] Average time from outreach → reply: [____] days Average time from call → proposal: [____] hours Average time from proposal → close: [____] days What's working: [____] What needs fixing: [____] Adjustment for Week 2: [____]

Using ChatGPT for Mid-Sprint Analysis

At day 7, pause for 30 minutes to analyze progress with ChatGPT. Feed it your scorecard data and get specific recommendations for the second week. This prevents wasting the final week on tactics that aren't working.

Mid-Sprint Analysis Prompt:

I'm running a 14-day revenue sprint. Here's my Day 1-7 scorecard data: ACTIVITY: - Outreach sent: [NUMBER] - Replies received: [NUMBER] ([%] response rate) - Calls booked: [NUMBER] - Calls conducted: [NUMBER] - Proposals sent: [NUMBER] REVENUE: - Target: £1,000 by Day 14 - Collected so far: £[AMOUNT] - Gap remaining: £[AMOUNT] CONVERSION DATA: - Outreach → Reply: [%] - Reply → Call booked: [%] - Call → Proposal: [%] - Proposal → Close: [%] QUALITATIVE NOTES: - What's working: [OBSERVATIONS] - What's not working: [PROBLEMS] - Surprises: [UNEXPECTED FINDINGS] Analyze this data and provide: 1. PERFORMANCE DIAGNOSIS: - Am I on track to hit £1,000? - Which metric is the bottleneck? - What's my biggest risk? 2. WEEK 2 RECOMMENDATIONS: - Should I maintain current approach or pivot? - Where should I increase effort? - What should I stop doing? - Specific tactics to close the revenue gap 3. REALISTIC FORECAST: - Based on Week 1 data, projected Week 2 revenue - Confidence level: [LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH] - Actions needed to hit target Be brutally honest. I need accurate assessment, not encouragement.

ChatGPT's analysis will show you: if your outreach volume is too low (need 30/day consistently), if conversion rates are off (maybe messaging is weak or pricing too high), if you're booking calls but not closing (discovery/proposal needs work), or if everything's working but you need more volume (double down on what works). Act on these insights immediately—week 2 is half your total sprint time.

After the Sprint: Scale or Iterate

Sprint Success: What Comes Next

If you hit £1,000+, you've proven product-market fit. Your offer sells, your pricing works, your delivery is viable. Now the question is: how do you scale from £1,000/14 days to £5,000/month, then £10,000/month? Use ChatGPT to map your scaling path based on what worked in the sprint.

Post-Sprint Scaling Plan:

Sprint results: - Revenue collected: £[AMOUNT] - Clients closed: [NUMBER] - Average deal size: £[AMOUNT] - Best performing channel: [CHANNEL] - Time invested: [HOURS] Based on these results, build 90-day scaling plan: MONTH 1 (Days 15-45): SYSTEMATIZE Goal: Repeat sprint results consistently Actions: - Maintain 30 touches/day (now habit, not sprint intensity) - Document what worked (codify into SOP) - Hire/outsource one task (probably list building or admin) - Improve conversion at weakest point (probably proposals → close) - Target: £2,000-3,000 revenue MONTH 2 (Days 46-75): OPTIMIZE Goal: Improve efficiency and conversion Actions: - Implement upsells (from Module 6) - Test price increase (15-20% for new clients) - Add second lead gen channel (but master first channel) - Convert best clients to retainers - Target: £4,000-5,000 revenue MONTH 3 (Days 76-105): SCALE Goal: Hit sustainable £10k/month run rate Actions: - Hire delivery help (VA or junior) to free your time for sales - Launch referral program (incentivize current clients) - Create productized offer for self-serve buyers (lower touch) - Build strategic partnerships (get others to refer) - Target: £7,000-10,000 revenue KEY METRICS TO TRACK: - Lead volume (maintain/grow) - Conversion rates (improve at each stage) - Average deal value (price increases + upsells) - Time to close (shorten through practice) - Client LTV (retainers + repeat business) RESOURCE ALLOCATION: Month 1: 80% doing, 20% systematizing Month 2: 60% doing, 40% optimizing Month 3: 40% doing, 60% scaling/delegating The path: Sprint proves concept → Month 1 repeats it → Month 2 optimizes it → Month 3 scales it By Day 105, you have: - Proven offer - Working systems - Growing revenue - Scalable process - Real business

Sprint Failure: What to Learn

If you didn't hit £1,000, don't spiral—diagnose. Where did the system break? Was it volume (not enough outreach), conversion (couldn't close), or delivery (couldn't fulfill)? Use ChatGPT to analyze your scorecard data and identify the specific bottleneck. Then run Sprint 2 with targeted fixes.

Sprint Failure Analysis:

Sprint outcome: £[AMOUNT] collected (target was £1,000) Review each stage for breakdown: STAGE 1 - OUTREACH VOLUME: Total sent: [NUMBER] (target: 210) Did you hit 30/day consistently? [YES/NO] If NO: Volume was the issue Fix: Better time blocking, simpler outreach process, accountability partner STAGE 2 - RESPONSE RATE: Replies: [NUMBER] out of [SENT] = [%] Target: 5-10% response rate If BELOW 5%: Messaging was too generic or ICP was wrong Fix: More personalization, tighter ICP, better signals STAGE 3 - CALL BOOKING: Booked: [NUMBER] out of [REPLIES] Target: 40-60% of replies should book If BELOW 40%: CTA was weak or trust not established Fix: Clearer value prop, easier booking process, social proof STAGE 4 - DISCOVERY/DEMO: Conducted: [NUMBER] calls Qualified: [NUMBER] If LOW QUALIFICATION: Talking to wrong people Fix: Better BANT in outreach phase, qualify before booking STAGE 5 - PROPOSAL: Sent: [NUMBER] Target: 80%+ of qualified calls should get proposal If BELOW 80%: Discovery call didn't uncover need Fix: Better discovery script, listen more STAGE 6 - CLOSING: Closed: [NUMBER] out of [PROPOSALS] Target: 30-50% close rate If BELOW 30%: Pricing, trust, or urgency issue Fix: Better value justification, proof assets, follow-up STAGE 7 - COLLECTION: Closed but not collected: [NUMBER] If ANY: Payment friction or commitment issue Fix: Easier payment process, deposits required upfront PRIMARY BOTTLENECK: [STAGE WHERE BIGGEST DROP OCCURRED] SPRINT 2 PLAN: Start date: [WITHIN 7 DAYS] Primary fix: [ADDRESS BOTTLENECK] Secondary improvement: [NEXT WEAKEST POINT] Adjusted target: [£500-800 FOR SPRINT 2, THEN £1000 FOR SPRINT 3] Don't give up. Every failure teaches. Most successful businesses failed first sprint. Iteration beats perfection.

Testimonial Collection Strategy

Whether you hit target or not, capture testimonials from anyone who bought. These are critical social proof for future sales. Use ChatGPT to craft testimonial requests that make it easy for clients to respond with usable quotes.

Testimonial Request Template:

Subject: Quick favor - 2 minutes? Hi [CLIENT NAME], Quick request: Would you mind writing 2-3 sentences about our work together? Specifically helpful: 1. What problem/challenge you had 2. Why you decided to work with us 3. What result you're seeing (even if early) This helps me show others with similar challenges how I might help them. No pressure to be formal—just honest feedback in your own words. Reply here or I can send questions to make it easier. Thanks! [YOUR NAME] --- ALTERNATIVE (MORE STRUCTURED): Hi [CLIENT NAME], You've been great to work with on [PROJECT]. Could you help me with a quick testimonial? Three questions (2-3 sentences each): 1. What was the situation before we started? 2. What made you choose to work with me? 3. What's different now / what results are you seeing? Your feedback helps prospects understand if I'm a fit for their needs. Happy to jump on a quick call if easier than writing. Thanks! [YOUR NAME] --- AFTER RECEIVING TESTIMONIAL: Subject: Thanks + Can I use this? [CLIENT NAME], Really appreciate you taking the time to write this: "[PASTE THEIR TESTIMONIAL]" Can I share this on my website/LinkedIn/proposals? □ Yes, use my full name and company □ Yes, but use just first name or initials □ Yes, but anonymize completely Thanks again! --- Build testimonial collection into process: - Request after first major milestone (not end of project) - Make it easy (give questions, offer to draft for approval) - Use immediately (add to proposal template, offer sheet, LinkedIn) - Video testimonials are 10x more powerful (offer to record 2-min Loom together)

Lab: Execute Your Sprint

Sprint Preparation Checklist

Before starting your 14-day sprint, complete this final checklist. Print the sprint rules. Set up your scorecard. Block your calendar. Tell someone you're doing this (accountability). Schedule your start date—ideally Monday so you have full first week.

Your Commitment

This sprint separates people who want to build a business from people who actually build businesses. It's uncomfortable. You'll have days where outreach feels pointless, where prospects ghost, where you question your pricing. That's normal. The sprint works because it forces you through discomfort into results.

Set your start date: [______]. Mark it in your calendar. Tell someone who will hold you accountable. Then execute daily—no excuses, no "I'll catch up tomorrow." The sprint rules exist to protect you from self-sabotage. Trust the process. Do the work. Track the metrics. Adjust based on data. Collect the revenue.

Monetization Opportunities

Sprint Methodology as Group Coaching

The 14-day sprint framework you just learned is itself a valuable coaching program. Service providers, consultants, and coaches know they need to generate revenue but lack the structure and accountability to execute. You can run group sprint cohorts where participants execute together with daily accountability, weekly group calls, and your guidance on obstacles.

Service Package: Revenue Sprint Cohort

A facilitated 14-day group program where 5-10 participants execute their revenue sprints simultaneously. You provide the framework, daily check-ins, troubleshooting support, and peer accountability. They get structure, community, and your pattern recognition from watching multiple sprints unfold.

  • Pre-Sprint (Week 0): Group orientation call, readiness audit for each participant, sprint setup support, cohort-specific Slack/WhatsApp group launch. Deliverable: All participants sprint-ready by Day 1.
  • Sprint Weeks (14 days): Daily async check-ins (participants post scorecard in group), mid-sprint group call (Day 7 analysis), real-time troubleshooting via Slack, daily tips/reminders sent to group, peer learning encouraged. Deliverable: Daily support and accountability.
  • Post-Sprint (Week 3): Group debrief call, individual sprint analysis for each participant, 30-day scaling plan workshop, graduation and testimonial collection. Deliverable: Path forward for each participant.
  • Participant Experience: They're not alone—others are executing alongside them. Your pattern recognition helps: "Three of you hit this same obstacle, here's how to solve it." Peer pressure (positive) creates completion rate 3x higher than solo execution.

Pricing Structure:

Sprint Cohort (Group): £600 ($750) per participant, 5-10 participants per cohort = £3,000-6,000 total cohort revenue. Run monthly (12 cohorts/year). Time investment: 10 hours per cohort. Annual potential: £36,000-72,000.

Private Sprint (1-on-1): £2,500 ($3,125) for solo participant who wants dedicated attention. Daily 1-on-1 check-ins, personalized troubleshooting, private Slack access. Same structure, individual delivery.

Sprint Alumni Mastermind: £300/month ($375) ongoing for sprint graduates. Monthly group calls, continued peer support, optimization workshops, new sprint challenges quarterly. Retention revenue stream.

Why People Pay for This

Everyone knows they should be doing consistent outreach and sales activity. Few actually do it. The sprint creates external structure and accountability they can't generate internally. They're paying for: forced execution (sprint rules), peer accountability (everyone's tracking), expert troubleshooting (you've seen the patterns), and compressed timeline (14 days vs. "someday"). Investment: £600. Outcome: First £1,000+ in revenue, proven systems, confidence to scale. ROI is immediate and obvious.

Marketing the Cohort

Promote sprints as "Revenue Sprint Cohort - Next start date: [DATE]". Limited spots (5-10) create urgency. Positioning: "Stop planning, start earning. 14 days to £1,000+ with daily accountability and proven framework." Target: consultants/coaches with offers but no revenue, service providers pivoting to new offerings, side hustlers ready to validate business ideas. Run free intro workshop showing sprint framework, then pitch cohort enrollment for next start date.